Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Motor\s+Mods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Motor\s+Mods\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Caseyh4312@aol.com; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:56:43 EST; yea i have the stock 260. I was thining about getting the 465 cfm, if i did. But what other mods could i do? That help "Tigers" run faster. What is everyone else running? That has the 260 and not a 3; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00105.html (7,202 bytes)
2. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <chris@cthompson.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:16:16 -0500; You e-mailed the whole list from something I sent you privately, Joey, so everyone is probably a bit confused. As I said in the e-mail, I wouldn't go with a 4bbl unless it was the smallest one you co; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00106.html (8,477 bytes)
3. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:14:50 -0700; Hi Chris, A few weeks (months?) ago the subject of four barrels came up and it turns out there is a 390 CFM Holley listed in most of the speed shops' catalogs. This would be a better choice perhaps f; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00107.html (8,951 bytes)
4. RE: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:33:11 -0500; I'm running a 260, 2bbl and I installed a Pertronix Ignitor and a slightly different cam, Competition Cam part # 31-215-2, when I went through the engine. I personally like the performance of this m; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00112.html (8,968 bytes)
5. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: <arado7@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:39:13 -0500; I concur with the idea of trying a stock Tiger out for performance before making any mods. It may have enough to meet your needs. In my own Tiger when I acquired it, it was fitted with a 600 cfm Ford; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00114.html (8,099 bytes)
6. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:57:44 -0800; Please ignore advise against a 4 barrel on a 260 in favor of advice from someone who has actually done it. First, you want the Edelbrock Hi-Rise F4B. It would be nice if you could get the LAT versio; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00115.html (9,508 bytes)
7. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <chris@cthompson.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:05:15 -0500; Steve off-list just pointed this out to me, and he's right! Too late at night tapping. I had put a 600cfm carb on and *that* was too big. The 465 is much better.... Chris; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00116.html (7,613 bytes)
8. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Caseyh4312@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:18:25 EST; yea i will drive my car as it is stock first. And my carpet and exterior trim is perfect. I had to replace the front trim on right as it was bent. But i fixed that already. I just cleaned all the 26; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00119.html (8,205 bytes)
9. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: mmcbeth@weiramericas.com; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:36:53 -0500; Thanks Steve, I was about to wade into this with a similar observation. I actually ran a 600cfm four barrel for four years on an almost stock motor (exhaust, cam etc) , with a single plane intake, no; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00121.html (9,175 bytes)
10. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <choffman9@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:57:14 -0500; Quick question on this carb issue. I have had out of the box 600 cfm Hollys on my cars in the past, both on tigers and Mustangs without any issues. I always used vacuum secondaries going on the assum; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00124.html (8,249 bytes)
11. RE: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:59:35 -0500; "But i always will want to have a faster car. It will never be fast enough." It all depend on exactly what you mean by faster car. The stock Tiger is plenty fast. It performs similarly to my stock '; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00128.html (9,724 bytes)
12. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:17:27 EST; Joey's comments make for a good question to ask. What would be a good build up for the 260? I know all the arguments for 302's and 289's, but what would you do if you only had the 260 to build (prete; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00130.html (7,660 bytes)
13. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:21:51 EST; 465 CFM too big? Don't think that's the case. It is the designated carb upgrade for the Tiger 260 motor. Ask Laifman how his works and the correct jetting. The carb is still available, got mine from; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00131.html (7,541 bytes)
14. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:35:49 -0800; build would destroyed Sean, all.... I have been kicking around this very thought. Here is what I came up with 1. Heads would have 63 cc chambers with 1.9 inch diameter intake, 1.6 inch diameter exhau; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00136.html (9,944 bytes)
15. RE: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>; Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:43:54 -0500; Dr Moonstone This is a good question and the answer is going to depend on what you want out of the engine and how much money you have to spend. You want to up the compression ratio, which a thinner h; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00139.html (8,497 bytes)
16. Re: Motor Mods (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:41:04 EST; The aluminum heads would be where I depart with Mayf. I too would use the Alu. head. Just saw a dart 540 CI motor running 12.5 to 1 compression using premium pump gas and 105 octane booster. Motor ha; /html/tigers/2005-03/msg00162.html (7,449 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]