Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MowoGroup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MowoGroup\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: MowoGroup (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 09:18:10 -0500; Sorry Mike, The G-group will not concede until we get something in writing..... :-).... I've researched all the MG books I have (a lot) and have come up with ziltch....Maybe a Lord Nuffield bio which; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00314.html (7,215 bytes)
2. Re: MowoGroup (score: 1): Author: BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 10:38:01 -0500; Terry: Your position fails on logic. If it was Nuffield group, why the Morris and Wolsley? Since the Nuffield group included MG then ,it is logical to use all three marques. Also, why does someone's; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00315.html (8,059 bytes)
3. Re: MowoGroup (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 23:29:30 -0500; Now Mike, this is powerful evidence since Anders has tremendous research resources at his disposal but the way he phrased it, well I cannot concede yet. Mike Allison testamony is powerful indeed also; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00321.html (7,461 bytes)
4. Fwd: MowoGroup (score: 1): Author: MGBay@aol.com; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 10:40:30 -0500; This MOWOG discussion has been interesting to me. For years I thought that it stood for Morris Wolseley Group. But recently a friend sent me Anders Ditlev Clausager's book. "Original MGB". In it on p; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00327.html (7,813 bytes)
5. Re: MowoGroup (score: 1): Author: BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 10:39:42 -0500; Go for it. Without offending Anders, his book is not without error. Thus this can never be resolved. It is interesting though, and Anders reply would be interesting. Mike; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00329.html (7,401 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]