- 1. Re: Mystery component (revisited) (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Sykes <stan.part@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 12:43:06 -0500
- I have received several off-list emails about this relay. I'm sending this to the list as it's easier than replying to each person's questions individually. The relay is indeed the item Joe Curry men
- /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00242.html (9,104 bytes)
- 2. Re: Mystery component (revisited) (score: 1)
- Author: "M. E. Foster" <foster_m@swbell.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 20:16:25 -0600
- Seeing my own words in print is making me cringe. I was referring to the annoying obscurity of the subject - NOT to your explanation which is quite clear and complete. It was late last night and I w
- /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00248.html (7,668 bytes)
- 3. Re: Mystery component (revisited) (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Sykes <stan.part@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 10:09:53 -0500
- No apology necessary, and no offense taken. I no longer receive the list "real time", but get the digest version containing about a day's worth of posts all at once. I tend to "surf" the digest fair
- /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00258.html (8,724 bytes)
- 4. Re: Mystery component (revisited) (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom O'Malley" <tomomalley@meganet.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 17:04:27 -0500
- Ah! I suppose I must jump in and take credit (or blame) for designating the "mystery component" as *lamp test relay*. Hayne's term, "Starter Relay", is no doubt a carryover from the earlier Federal S
- /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00264.html (8,405 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu