Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NLBC\:\s+Was\s+Front\s+suspension\s+rebuild\,\s+now\s+product\s+liability\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re:NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 10:07:39 -0500
Since we're off the subject here, I'm curious if anyone knows any specifics about this ATX tire thing. Are these tires giving out under normal driving or are they blowing because they're underinflate
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00252.html (8,907 bytes)

2. Re: NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:46:59 EDT
Depends on who you ask. When you ask a Ford guy...it's the dang tires made by the union jerks at Firestone, and when I was down at the Firestone shop trading for Bridgestones, it was Fords fault for
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00275.html (9,189 bytes)

3. Re: NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 22:52:23 -0500
Must say I thought the same - maybe a little bit of truth, but mostly overblown. Then I saw my friend's truck. It was a Ford Ranger extended cab w/ Wilderness AT's. Three of the four were affected by
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00276.html (10,611 bytes)

4. Re: NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:17:50 -0400
The press definitely gets it wrong a lot (most?) of the time, but I guess the answer to your question is: it depends on your POV. I doubt that the semi-pro soccer player from Tulsa who was paralyzed
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00281.html (12,032 bytes)

5. Re: NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 11:09:18 EDT
<< union jerks at Firestone, >> Not pro or con on unions, RH, but the tires "in question" where made by supervisors during a strike. Cheers........... Ed
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00282.html (7,895 bytes)

6. Re: NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 11:19:58 EDT
<< I would not trust Firestone to look out for my best interests. Can't say that I disagree Jeff. I do think the press jump in too quick and too hard in many if not most interest, but having said tha
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00283.html (8,466 bytes)

7. Re: NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 12:40:33 -0400
Not commenting on the current Firestone fiasco. But, I remember the large scale and definitive British study that started the connection between red meat and heart attacks. One conclusion was that in
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00286.html (10,360 bytes)

8. Re: NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 13:45:43 -0400
I agree that there are poorly-conducted and poorly-presented studies. Additionally, there is a symbiosis between the medical research community and the press that I do not like. As a basic researche
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00295.html (9,014 bytes)

9. Re: NLBC: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 14:09:17 -0400
Geez, the one time I go overboard, there's a research fellow right on me. My apologies. But it does seem that we have had lot's of bad policy based on axe-to-grind research or media short cuts. Lates
/html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00300.html (10,431 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu