Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NO\s+LBC\s+\-\-\s+WAY\s+OFF\s+TOPIC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NO\s+LBC\s+\-\-\s+WAY\s+OFF\s+TOPIC\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: richard.arnold@juno.com (Richard D. Arnold); Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 08:59:04 EST; Knowing this is way off topic, I will consider myself flamed in advance. Would appreciate the assistance of those with a more scientific mind than my own: Am working on a project for school (an Evide; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00473.html (10,001 bytes)
2. NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: richard.arnold@juno.com (Richard D. Arnold); Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 09:01:09 EST; Knowing this is way off topic, I will consider myself flamed in advance. Would appreciate the assistance of those with a more scientific mind than my own: Am working on a project for school (an Evide; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00474.html (10,125 bytes)
3. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: Teacher122@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 21:03:51 EST; << Am working on a project for school (an Evidence course). Scenario: Driver A shoots Driver B four times during an argument over whether B scratched A's MG with a key (semi-LBC content). Does anyone; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00517.html (11,151 bytes)
4. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: "Scott Gardner" <gardner7@pilot.infi.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:02:34 +0000; 1 mile/five minutes = 12 mph 1 mile/four minutes = 15 mph 1 mile/three minutes = 20 mph 1 mile/two minutes = 30 mph 1 mile/one minute = 60 mph Well, I've always considered a "normal" walking pace to; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00528.html (12,098 bytes)
5. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: Nory@webtv.net (Nory); Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:03:26 -0500; Regardless of your calculations, it's pretty tough to claim you fired four shots in self-defense. I would think one shot would have been sufficient to stop the approaching attacker. -NORY Don't assum; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00530.html (8,293 bytes)
6. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: Hert <hert@wxs.nl>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 09:50:54 +0100; For many years the Dutch police used to a type of bullet that had hardly any stopping power at all. The bullets were small and slick, and could easily pass clear through the body. Quite often a perso; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00535.html (8,536 bytes)
7. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 08:01:07 -0800 (PST); Dear Netters, =%ORegardless of your calculations, it's pretty tough to claim you fired =%Ofour shots in self-defense. I would think one shot would have been =%Osufficient to stop the approaching atta; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00540.html (9,411 bytes)
8. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 11:26:55 -0500; Please note that "knock-down power" is a product of television only, not of physics. In order for a bullet to be travelling fast enough to knock someone down, it would have to be accelerated to this; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00541.html (9,092 bytes)
9. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: Blake Wylie <bwylie@hiwaay.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:46:27 -0600 (CST); I heard something like this... they would charge at the US soldiers, and they were usually doped up on morphine or something. I think the soldiers were using .38s at the time, and the bullets would j; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00543.html (10,051 bytes)
10. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: miker15@juno.com; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:27:13 EST; Probably a good idea,I lived in Holland for about ten months and was rarely troubled by marauding elephants however I did lose three car radios. . . "rot verdomme!" I hope the police used the bullets; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00545.html (8,994 bytes)
11. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 08:51:12 -0800 (PST); Dear Trevor, All I am doing is repeating the logic behind the larger calibar side arm. The "knock Down" I refer to is not the hollywood type of knock down where the victim is blown backwards, but whe; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00546.html (8,980 bytes)
12. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 08:57:56 -0800 (PST); Dear Netters, =%OI heard something like this... they would charge at the US soldiers, and =%Othey were usually doped up on morphine or something. I think the soldiers =%Owere using .38s at the time,; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00548.html (11,157 bytes)
13. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: "Dan Ray" <danray@bluegrass.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 12:16:18 -0600; I don't know if you've ever fired a Govt. Colt .45, but the bullet is almost slow enough to see, and at half an inch around. If hit with one, at least in the torso or head it certainly would knock yo; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00550.html (10,472 bytes)
14. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: Blake Wylie <bwylie@hiwaay.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 11:31:34 -0600 (CST); Yeah, a .45 size bullet is pretty big. Heck, if I were hit with one, I would fall down. :) Blake; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00553.html (10,989 bytes)
15. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: Carol <car@intersatx.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 12:39:50 -0800; Hmmmm.... I've not had the occasion to shoot anybody, but ... if I were worried enough to fire one shot, I don't think I'd be waiting to see if I hit the right mark and if the subject had slowed down; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00555.html (9,378 bytes)
16. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:52:59 -0800 (PST); Dear Carol, =%O =%OBelieve it or not, I'm a very peaceful person and don't even want that .357 =%Oaround here. AAMOF, it's for sale. I'll just keep the .22 The Mossad used .22 pistols as their prefer; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00556.html (8,924 bytes)
17. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John McEwen); Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 12:34:40 -0500; A man won't fall down if hit by a .45 slug - providing rigor mortis sets in John Browning's invention is an example of one of those pure designs which basically hasn't changed since its inception. Th; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00559.html (12,086 bytes)
18. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: Carol <car@intersatx.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 14:11:20 -0800; Transformer fuses on the common overhead secondary transformer. I can TRY to explain it, but I'm sure there's an EE out there who can do a better job of it! Sort of a ,22 shell with no bullet, just p; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00562.html (9,908 bytes)
19. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:38:01 EST; Well, that puts you in the majority. In fact, probably the only people who thought he was not guilty was the Jury. Rick Morrison 72 MGBGT 74 Midget ___________________________________________________; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00598.html (8,933 bytes)
20. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:38:01 EST; The old army issue Colt model 1911 .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol would not knock me down when I fired it, but I once had to shoot a Viet Cong . I missed his body, but hit his leg just above the k; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg00602.html (10,818 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]