Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NOS\s+vs\s+REPRO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NOS\s+vs\s+REPRO\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: CMeinel464@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 10:21:13 -0400; I don't know if you had the oppurtunity to read my posting NOS vs. REPRO, if you haven't, please take a look. I have been reproducing parts for years and as you well know, by law I can not put origi; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00140.html (8,934 bytes)
2. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com; Date: Thu, 18 Jul 96 09:52:33 PST; -One of my first concerns on being interested in repro-ing the air cleaner assembly was the trademark/copyright concerns because of the "AC" on the top piece. Any Patent/Trademark attorney's please; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00147.html (10,799 bytes)
3. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: RevSteveP@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 14:23:41 -0400; This gets a bit silly after awhile. Because none of our cars is original! Like an art work or a rare coin can be original. No Tiger has 1967 gas in it! No Tiger has 1967 oil in it, and none of you wo; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00151.html (8,341 bytes)
4. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: STUART_BRENNAN@HP-Andover-om3.om.hp.com; Date: Thu, 18 Jul 96 13:16:43 -0600; To summarize Rev. Steve, and misquote the Bible at the same time: "Let he who is without 'repro' parts cast the first stone" I'm not worried, because he'll have to walk over to my place to do it. His; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00152.html (8,262 bytes)
5. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jul 96 12:24:22 PDT; While I don't necessarily want to come down on Frank's side here, I'm wondering if is it reasonable to be comparing perishables like gasoline, oil, tires or even rubber parts to a "non perishable" i; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00153.html (8,502 bytes)
6. Re[2]: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com; Date: Thu, 18 Jul 96 13:46:58 PST; Guess what; -I agree with all of you. -Therefore, I can have the repro quoted both WITH & WITHOUT the logo. Then people can have a choice, depending on demand. Not bad Mktng., huh? I will publish my; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00154.html (9,550 bytes)
7. RE: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: "Les McClelland, x4526" <LESM@uvsg.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jul 96 14:49:00 CDT; As a non-purist Tiger owner what I am concerned with is keeping the beast on the road. There currently is very little collector interest in Tigers as indicated by the current declining value of these; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00155.html (8,592 bytes)
8. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 23:06:37 -0700 (PDT); Hey Roland, thanks for "not necessarily" coming down on my side and making the obvious point that I was too frustrated to make after reading all those strange if not just plain assinine comments. Of; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00167.html (9,884 bytes)
9. Re[2]: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com; Date: Fri, 19 Jul 96 10:31:16 PST; -This is really funny. It almost makes me sorry I didn't pick Psychology as a major in college. MY FAVORITE: that a TIGER air cleaner is a "show-stopper". This tells me: 1) the rest of the car(s) ar; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00174.html (11,522 bytes)
10. NOS vs Repro (score: 1): Author: "STEVEN M. METCALFE" <MS02488@msbg.med.ge.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:08:49 -0500; .int tigers@autox.team.net I was just thinking, there are several other restored cars (i.e. Bentleys Rolls, Duesenbergs, etc.) which have had several parts reproduced, even hand made from scratch to; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00183.html (8,962 bytes)
11. RE: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atherton (Entex)" <a-richat@MICROSOFT.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 03:26:11 -0700; Have I just completely lost my mind? I thought that Carol Shelby was already dead. I remember reading about his death about two or three years ago. There was even a TV special I saw about him, which; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00218.html (9,548 bytes)
12. RE: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 96 10:51:23 PDT; He's missing a couple of OEM body organs, but he's still around. Roland; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00258.html (8,111 bytes)
13. RE: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: lrw@aop.com (LARRY WRIGHT); Date: Wed, 24 Jul 96 14:01 EDT; Considering he doesn't have a cowl, what body part (or how many body parts) get changed before he won't pass TAC as he's not Carroll Shelby anymore? (There; how's that for bringing the thread back t; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00259.html (8,563 bytes)
14. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: "G.S.Sutherland" <G.S.Sutherland@phil.hull.ac.uk>; Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 12:02:29 +0100 (BST); + Considering he doesn't have a cowl, what body part (or how many + body parts) get changed before he won't pass TAC as he's not Carroll + Shelby anymore? Actually, we're going to have to be careful:; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00278.html (7,948 bytes)
15. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: Steven Laifman <av342@lafn.org>; Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 15:08:27 +0100; Carroll has already done that himself with his brand new old Cobra made with early NEW blocks he found in Australia (well, would you believe he actually only had the valve covers, and the rest of th; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00320.html (8,107 bytes)
16. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: lallegrucci@westpub.com; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 96 00:42:17 -0600; Okay, so now is he a Shelby MkI or MkII? Can he re-register as a newer model? Will he pass emissions? (tee-hee) Lucky he could find a parts car though. Brian Corrigan; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00322.html (8,136 bytes)
17. Re: NOS vs REPRO (score: 1): Author: "G.S.Sutherland" <G.S.Sutherland@phil.hull.ac.uk>; Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 13:06:04 +0100 (BST); + Okay, so now is he a Shelby MkI or MkII? Can he re-register as a + newer model? Will he pass emissions? (tee-hee) Lucky he could find a + parts car though. Nah, they'll insist that he's the Mark I; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00328.html (7,737 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]