Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Neon\s+\-\s+Lights\s+out\?\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Stock\s+class\s+reclassings$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Neon\s+\-\s+Lights\s+out\?\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Stock\s+class\s+reclassings$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Neon - Lights out? (was Re: Stock class reclassings) (score: 1): Author: Bob Monday <boysrus_racing@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:14:59 -0700 (PDT); I don't see any separation between SOHC ACRs (a.k.a. SSC cars) and DOHC ACRs (a.k.a. SSB cars). C'mon guys, cut us some slack here! <G> Seriously, I'm thinking I'd rather take my chances with "the ho; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00209.html (7,260 bytes)
2. Re: Neon - Lights out? (was Re: Stock class reclassings) (score: 1): Author: Mark Darby <markds33@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:23:28 -0700 (PDT); Hi Team! I cant believe the SEB is even considering placing the NEON in class 5 with the Type R! I thought the 1999 season was proof that the cars shouldn't be class mates! The 3 times Daddio squared; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00212.html (8,963 bytes)
3. Re: Neon - Lights out? (was Re: Stock class reclassings) (score: 1): Author: Scott Sawyer <reddog_es22@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:13:47 -0400; I could be wrong here, but don't the SOHC Neon's have a better torque curve for autocrossing? They are separated in road racing because you are able to keep the DOHC in the top end where the power is; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00214.html (7,885 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]