Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Class\s+Philosophy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Class\s+Philosophy\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: New Class Philosophy (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:09:58 -0500; He had "prototype" shocks on that car I think. I remember him being pretty fast in it at the time. beat or I wouldn't argue with your assesment, but the only thing that bothers me is that the classe; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00057.html (7,934 bytes)
2. Re: New Class Philosophy (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Hirt" <nxracer@mediaone.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 13:25:07 -0500; So if in fact DS is the new "factory tuner" class why does the Neon not belong there? After all it is the "American Club Racer" package and when it first came out was only available to SCCA members.; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00062.html (7,394 bytes)
3. Re: New Class Philosophy (score: 1): Author: Caleb Miller <millerca@one.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 23:09:35 -0400; Now if a Neon ACR isn't a "factory tuner" car, I'm not sure what you would call it. The fact is, that several of the top GS drivers over the last few years would use top DS drivers as their "stretch"; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00077.html (7,786 bytes)
4. Re: New Class Philosophy (score: 1): Author: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:31:45 -0400; I would call it one mean little MF that came along, appealed to some top drivers through their contingency program, was cheap to buy, and would pay for itself over a year or so. I would hardly call i; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00082.html (10,006 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]