Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Coil\s+\-\s+Barney\s+was\s+$half$\s+right\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Coil\s+\-\s+Barney\s+was\s+$half$\s+right\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: New Coil - Barney was (half) right! (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 00:52:29; And Barney is still chuckling over this discussion. I appreciate the faith that some people put in me by expressing their support of my utterances just because I am me, but in fact Barney was only ha; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00767.html (11,596 bytes)
2. Re: New Coil - Barney was (half) right! (score: 1): Author: DANMAS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 12:32:34 EDT; Barney, Actually, I did catch that, but didn't comment on it. As a matter of fact, I and a few others from the Triumph list are invovled in a very lengthy discussion of this, and the points you raise; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00782.html (12,333 bytes)
3. Re: New Coil - Barney was (half) right! (score: 1): Author: ccrobins <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 22:51:44 -0500; Hi Barney, As an electronics tech and field engineer with 35 years in the gun and missile testing game at White Sand and McGregor Ranges and as a sometime professional auto tech, I've stayed out of t; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00797.html (11,134 bytes)
4. Re: New Coil - Barney was (half) right! (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 09:30:16; Hot damn! I knew the expertise was lurking out there somewhere, given the right challenge. Thank you, Charley Robinson. ignition, .... Sorry, Charley. On this list it's never the last question. <:( p; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00814.html (10,276 bytes)
5. Re: New Coil - Barney was (half) right! (score: 1): Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 15:51:31 -0400; (snip of major proportions) Ooh - ooh! I wanna guess! How about putting an ohmmeter on the condenser - one lead to the connector, the other to the case. Meter should intially peg over to zero, then g; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00819.html (8,069 bytes)
6. Re: New Coil - Barney was (half) right! (score: 1): Author: DANMAS@aol.com; Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 18:41:54 EDT; Charley, We're getting close, but we ain't there yet. I have no argument with the first half of this statement, but a little clarification of the second half is needed. The current decay through the; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00829.html (10,819 bytes)
7. Re: New Coil - Barney was (half) right! (score: 1): Author: ccrobins <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 23:30:33 -0500; I was hoping this wouldn't happen. Do your waveforms take into account the diffs in the lags across the two reactances? Also, how about the directions in which the primary and secondary windings are; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00840.html (7,334 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]