Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+MGs\s+and\s+Minis\s+in\s+America\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+MGs\s+and\s+Minis\s+in\s+America\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:11:00 +0100; If the deal does materialise, then I should think that a Chrysler distribution deal would be highly likely. Having said that, although there is no established MG dealer network (the old British Leyla; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00545.html (10,658 bytes)
2. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: Wizzrd1001@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:27:51 -0400 (EDT); I seem to remember in a review of the MGF in either a British car mag, or maybe Road and Track that the MGF would not be brought into the US because it would pose a problem for BMW Z3 sales and Miata; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00557.html (9,430 bytes)
3. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 14:55:58 -0400 (EDT); << but, seeing as how the only Minis available are either already restored cars, or rough project cars, >> I recently saw a brand new Mini convertible shell at MiniMania.....bolt on your old componen; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00565.html (7,918 bytes)
4. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 01:09:14 -0400 (EDT); << But folks - this is all still speculation. OK, lets get some wild speculation going.......The President of Chrysler is one Bob Lutz who ran a TC while he was here at the University of Cal, Berserk; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00612.html (8,465 bytes)
5. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 09:52:00 +0100; I know that, as you have said, according to the rules, `international business doesn't work like that', but there are in this case some pretty sound business reasons why it might. Add in a dash of a; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00618.html (9,466 bytes)
6. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: The Richards <smrm@coastalnet.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 06:34:06 -0500; One of the reasons Rover has trotted out to defend the non-return of MG to the states is the lack of a dealer network, and legal problems left by B-L (exactly what were those problems?). They claim t; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00623.html (9,568 bytes)
7. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 06:42:07 -0400; The prowler is an ugly car. What we need is a Supercharged MG, similar to the MGA or MGB, but with a little more Aerodynamic work...and a cool interior. Apple didn't accept the investment...Steve Jo; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00690.html (9,470 bytes)
8. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 06:45:40 -0400; Ok with all this talk about Mopar buy Austin Rover group from BMW, why don't we the enthusiast buy it? I am sure with everyone on the lists, combined with everyone from the major clubs we could all p; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00691.html (9,052 bytes)
9. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 06:52:31 -0400; Once again, why don't we (the enthusiasts) start some sort of dealer network? I would still think it is better to completely buy MG. They are still plenty of private dealerships that used to sell MG; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00692.html (10,332 bytes)
10. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: MLishego@aol.com; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 11:15:03 -0400 (EDT); I don't think the prowler is ugly. I do think that if Chrysler designed a MG on the Eagle Talon platform, and fitted it with a magnum V-8 or V-10, I'd have to buy it! Until then, I'll dream and drool; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00701.html (9,030 bytes)
11. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 17:31:00 +0100; A nice dream... Ok with all this talk about Mopar buy Austin Rover group from BMW, why don't we the enthusiast buy it? I am sure with everyone on the lists, combined with everyone from the major club; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00709.html (9,531 bytes)
12. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 17:33:00 +0100; Did you know (useless info time) that the bodies of the Prowler and the MGF are both the responsibility of the same company (Mayflower)? -- From: MLishego@aol.com To: mowogmg@pil.net; TATERRY@aol.com; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00710.html (9,442 bytes)
13. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: "Michael P. Ohleger" <mikeoh@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 14:32:47 -0400; <<snip>> Of Course the prowler isn't ugly to children of the sixties. I suppose a 16 year old may dislike the design. I would hate to see happen to the MG as happened to the Corvette. We Americans ge; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00713.html (10,457 bytes)
14. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: Jurgen Hartwig <gt0003a@prism.gatech.edu>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 17:50:59 -0400; similar to I have to agree with Michael here; an MG isn't an MG when it has a V-10 or other large bore engine installed. I think the only large engine applicable in an MG is a V-8 of Rover or Buick d; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00724.html (11,225 bytes)
15. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 17:40:50 -0400; No, MGs are only allowed to have 4 or 6 cylinders, or a British V8. Sorry that is my opinion. KMR Kai M. Radicke -- mowogmg@pil.net @ 1966 MGB -- http://www.pil.net/~mowogmg Dialogue Internet -- Int; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00726.html (9,321 bytes)
16. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: MLishego@aol.com; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:33:04 -0400 (EDT); One problem: I'm not a flower child. I was born in the seventies and grew up around luxury boxes like mid 80's towncars and boring stuff like that. The 90's cars all look alike also. It's too tough t; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00732.html (9,095 bytes)
17. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: MLishego@aol.com; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:55:52 -0400 (EDT); Ok, Ok, I can sorta agree. But, I also can't see too many people enjoying their little 1.8 when I-95 traffic blows by them at upwards of 85mph. There are ways of subtly installing a big engine that c; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00733.html (11,641 bytes)
18. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 23:14:13 -0400; I agree with most of your sentiment, but I would like to differentiate between engine size and power. 130hp is fairly typical for a non-turbo 4 cylinder these days. Not many cars make under 100hp any; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00734.html (9,951 bytes)
19. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 07:35:00 +0100; I tend to agree with these sentiments, but feel that that there is some degree of balance involved - there is a world of difference between omygosh over-the-top (AC/Shelby Cobra 427?) versus wow-but-; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00738.html (12,371 bytes)
20. Re: New MGs and Minis in America? (score: 1): Author: hert@worldaccess.nl; Date: Thu, 14 Aug 97 08:07:53 GMT; The people who buy the US-built Z3 (the standard version comes with bad seats, boring interior and it sounds like a vacuum cleaner) seem not to mind... and the F is faster than that car. The America; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00740.html (10,932 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]