- 1. New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Tegler <ptegler@cablespeed.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:07:10 -0400
- Calum Davis has been condensing all the Spitfire engine stuff out there into a concise guide for the average Spit owner. I've taken his original, rather lengthy HTML document, and with his blessing h
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00197.html (8,092 bytes)
- 2. Re: New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: Vic Whitmore <vicwhit@home.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 23:14:48 -0400
- Hey Paul you dropped the "l". ...should be .html Vic Whitmore -- Vic Whitmore 76 Spitfire Thornhill, Ontario http://www.vicwhit.com
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00199.html (8,527 bytes)
- 3. Re: New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 20:19:37 -0700
- The author's name is Calum E. Douglas, not Davis. The original, "lengthy" HTML document can be found on MY site, here: http://www.ohms.com/spitfire/engine_building.shtml I was waiting to announce th
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00200.html (10,462 bytes)
- 4. Re: New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Tegler <ptegler@cablespeed.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 09:54:06 -0400
- This is my second response. to these comments. I prefer not to waste my web space duplicating stuff already avail. on the net I simply place links on my site to let people find that specific material
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00207.html (12,066 bytes)
- 5. RE: New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Nelson" <mnelson@tconl.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 10:35:08 -0500
- Please, put aside the bickering and realize that you both provide a wealth of information for the Triumph enthusiast. I used Paul's site as a resource just last week with my alternator conversion an
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00208.html (14,552 bytes)
- 6. RE: New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: "Daniel L Parrott" <parrotthead01@home.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:21:13 -0400
- Couldn't agree more. Dan Parrott 1980 Spit "PJ" --Original Message-- From: owner-spitfires@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-spitfires@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Mike Nelson Sent: Saturday, April 07, 200
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00209.html (15,032 bytes)
- 7. Re: New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:43:37 -0700
- Paul Tegler is not to blame for my earlier rant and I owe him an apology. I'd also like to explain why I was upset and the misunderstanding that prompted my ire. Those of us who provide a great deal
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00214.html (19,692 bytes)
- 8. Re: New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: BrYarboro@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 18:51:29 EDT
- << Gentlemen, Paul, Jeff: Please, put aside the bickering and realize that you both provide a wealth of information for the Triumph enthusiast. I used Paul's site as a resource just last week with my
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00230.html (8,920 bytes)
- 9. Re: New Spitfire engine performance guide on line (score: 1)
- Author: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <doug@dougbraun.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 21:47:05 -0400
- For a relatively small amount of data like the performance guide (the test has less bytes of data than a average-sized picture) there is certainly no harm in copying it. What if the only Web site car
- /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00239.html (8,227 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu