Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+car\s+classing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+car\s+classing\s*$/: 53 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

1. New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Fine, Kim" <kimfine@teletech.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:48:39 -0700; I don't think I have seen any postings or proposals on where the new Mitsubishi Lancer Evo or Subaru WRX Sti will be classed. Any specualtion? It will be interesting to see where you put two boxy lit; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00190.html (8,986 bytes)
2. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <cfgold@intrex.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:44:20 -0500; Kim, I can't agree with you more about the Cooper S! Were the SEB people too busy running their own cars at Topeka to really examine the cars that were running before moving it based on one guy's per; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00193.html (9,722 bytes)
3. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: bburns37@att.net; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:06:34 +0000; As someone who struggled uncompetitively at the local level with an '02 VW Jetta GLS 1.8T (180HP and the road-hugging weight to match) in GS last year even though I still had fun autocrossing the ca; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00194.html (8,127 bytes)
4. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Brian Berryhill" <bikepoet@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:14:33 -0600; I thought regional level competition was about learning driving skills, improving already learned driving skills, having fun, and socializing! I've only been to regional level events, and I've been t; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00198.html (8,469 bytes)
5. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: bburns37@att.net; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:46:56 +0000; Brian, I agree. Even if you have no chance of winning your class, there are always attainable goals that you can set for yourself and still keep the interest level going. When I bought the car, being; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00202.html (8,679 bytes)
6. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <cfgold@intrex.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:41:52 -0500; I too agree on the lower levels, but we bought our 2002 Celica GT and spent uncompetitive to an overdog car straight off the showroom floor due to a hasty knee jerk decision by the SEB without even a; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00204.html (9,423 bytes)
7. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 14:14:33 -0400; Nope, for some regional competition is the be-all and end-all. They are deadly serious about it. We treat those customers very well in our region since they form a reliable nucleus to sustain our pro; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00206.html (8,001 bytes)
8. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:24:36 -0600; No offense, but did you somehow believe that because you bought a new car (and spent an additional 10k???!!!), that the SCCA would freeze classing? Welcome to Stock class autocrossing, ya'll! Everyon; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00207.html (9,355 bytes)
9. RE: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Madurski, Ronald M" <ronald.m.madurski@lmco.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:04:40 -0500; I was wondering the same thing. I haven't spent half of that on my Red Devil (FM 440) in 3 years and that includes buying the car :-) Ronald M. Madurski Lockheed Martin Information Technologies 304 6; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00209.html (8,958 bytes)
10. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <cfgold@intrex.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:02:06 -0500; The SEB can and did reclass a new model car within the first year without member input. The reclassication request was made by the sole competitor at Topeka who finished 16th, 5 out of the trophies w; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00212.html (10,441 bytes)
11. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: Paul Parkanzky <parkanz1@msu.edu>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:31:04 -0500; Out of curiosity, why would you purchase a 2002 Celica GT and then dump $10k into it when you could have bought a much faster GTS? Clearly it wasn't your budget... Paul Parkanzky TeamMRC /// unsubscr; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00214.html (8,906 bytes)
12. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:07:11 -0600; move Note that the SEB does not always agree with everything that goes out for member feedback. We are a member-driven organization and sometimes, when inundated with letters to change a rule or clas; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00219.html (10,235 bytes)
13. RE: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Brian Garfield" <garfield@mini2.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:05:01 -0500; Kim, I'll go ahead and respond since I (and my co-driver) was the only Cooper S at Nationals this year. I requested the move based on Dean Sapp, Marshall Cone (my co-driver), and my performance in th; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00220.html (13,093 bytes)
14. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:14:50 -0800; Brian, can you clarify this part? KeS /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/a; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00222.html (8,855 bytes)
15. RE: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Brian Garfield" <garfield@mini2.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:31:19 -0500; No problem. In order to fit a 225 with good clearance, the offset of the wheel would be about 40mm for the 16x6.5 or 17x7. The lowest you can legally go would be a 42mm (or 41.5?, don't have the calc; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00223.html (9,580 bytes)
16. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "racer93@prodigy.net" <racer93@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:04:11 -0500; <<Re: Our prep costs: shocks - $3K 5 sets of racing tires, mounting and balancing - 3.5K 3 sets of racing wheels -1.6K 5 alignments -.5K entry fees, travel costs, lost income, T&T schools, etc. to g; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00227.html (9,850 bytes)
17. RE: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 07:28:01 -0600; [snippage of good comparison data] One other thing to mention is the lack of front suspension adjustment for the Mini. This drastically negates the full use of the 215/40-16 tires that folks run on; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00228.html (10,188 bytes)
18. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <cfgold@intrex.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:38:26 -0500; I keep hearing that "there's nothing that can be done to improve the Mini S". Let's tell the truth: "I'm not a good enough chassis setup person to know what to do to improve the S until someone who i; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00229.html (11,271 bytes)
19. Re: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <cfgold@intrex.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:42:29 -0500; Those are from our actual records. 38 events including 8 national events with two drivers in 2002. I think your signature says it all. -- Original Message -- From: <racer93@prodigy.net> To: <autox@au; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00230.html (10,317 bytes)
20. RE: New Car Classing (score: 1): Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 07:40:11 -0600; Since you responded to my message, Chuck, I'll assume you think I am saying that. I am not. Never have. Just to be clear, my point was not that "nothing significant can be done to improve the Mini",; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00231.html (9,234 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]