- 1. RE: New dash light debate... (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Hoy <larryhoy@cwix.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:13:30 -0700
- This is very long, if you are not inclined to read long messages press your delete key now. You know, it's probably over in the upper right hand corner of your keyboard. Mike [Lishego] here's a messa
- /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00002.html (10,480 bytes)
- 2. Re: New dash light debate... (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 20:47:47 +0100
- In addition to the comprehensive reply from Larry. Your 7.2v draws a nominal .22 amps at 7.2v and your 6.3v draws a nominal .15 amps at 6.3 volts. At 12v the 6.3v will draw double that, which is gett
- /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00047.html (8,364 bytes)
- 3. Re: New dash light debate... (score: 1)
- Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 12:17:46 -0800
- FYI: I have the Rat Shack #50 bulbs installed and have had none of them burn out yet. I keep the rheostat close to the lowest setting and they are still quite a bit brighter than the old bulbs. Clean
- /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00050.html (6,847 bytes)
- 4. New dash light debate... (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Lishego" <mikesl@tartan.sapc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 01:32:57 -0500
- Hello all, In my quest for quality MG lighting products, I've been everywhere, but Radio Shack seems to be the best. *snicker snicker* Seriously, I have been using the number 50 lights religiously in
- /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01852.html (8,675 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu