Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+data\s+in\!\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 10:06:00 -0600
According to the limited data I have collected so far. the breakdown goes like this: RED(all types) 32.37% Blues (all types) 16.76% Greens (all types) 16.18% White (all types) 9.83% Maroon/Purple etc
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01301.html (7,357 bytes)

2. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 08:47:10 -0800
Richard, I'm not understanding your meaning. If you mean the numbers don't add up to 100%, please re-add. Other than that, please explain.
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01305.html (8,244 bytes)

3. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 10:40:18 -0800
Joe, I think it means you respond to about 98% of all postings to the list. Lot of time on your hands Joe? Deano
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01309.html (8,727 bytes)

4. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 09:53:22 -0800
Deano, Lately, yes... Business has been rather slow... But I have been watching this list rather closely for Spit owners that pop in occasionally. I can'y let even one slip through my grasp. The data
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01311.html (8,864 bytes)

5. RE: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 11:47:27 -0600
Joe writes back (of course): I forgot you went to Texas Tech. The joke is.... let me put it another way: Responses to emails on list.... 98% At least the other listers responding off line got it. Hav
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01312.html (7,578 bytes)

6. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 18:02:54 +0000 (GMT)
your contributions are appreciated! Romano 1977 Spit Oxford UK (lurking most of the time, still a 'novice') -- == Dr. Romano T. Kroemer Phys. & Theoret. Chem. Lab. University of Oxford South Parks R
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01313.html (7,883 bytes)

7. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 10:31:12 -0800
Let's be accurate and fair. Fellow listers, since 9/19/97 there have been a total of 4,960 posts to this list of which 418 have been by Joe. That is a respectable 8.43%. We'll leave it to some UNIX g
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01314.html (9,897 bytes)

8. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:20:43 -0800
Joe, All of the above apply. Deano
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01315.html (9,322 bytes)

9. RE: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 13:49:39 -0600
Wow, we need to recalculate who really has too much time on their hands;-) Richard ________________________________________________________ To: curry@wolfenet.com@INTERNET; ecopaige@metro.net@INTERN
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01318.html (10,156 bytes)

10. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 16:28:26 -0800
HEY!!! You people quit picking on Joe! I have received alot of help from him. For what it is worth Joe, i appreciate the help. Lew 63 and 67 spit
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01335.html (9,109 bytes)

11. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 12:28:22 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
I find that the lower 30% range seems to be true. Is that an extra 30% on top of the percentage that were already (no pun intended!) a shade of red?? You ought to come to Stafford all the bloody spi
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01362.html (7,661 bytes)

12. Re: New data in! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 23:25:52 -0500 (EST)
<< Richard, I'm not understanding your meaning. If you mean the numbers don't add up to 100%, please re-add. Other than that, please explain. >> Joe, You provide us all with valuable information, and
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01404.html (7,665 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu