Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+look\s+Website\s+$JLC$\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+look\s+Website\s+$JLC$\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. RE: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:51:36 -0800; For listers who have been visiting my website... Is this new version (built with Dreamweaver) better or should I return to the previous one (built with FrontPage)? Please see here: http://www.leclain; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00125.html (7,628 bytes)
2. Re: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:16:00 -0600 reply-type=original with any abuse report; I prefer the new. There is something about FrontPage sites that always looks so "cookie-cutter". The code on the new page looks much cleaner than FrontPage usually generates, too. David Lieb; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00126.html (7,899 bytes)
3. Re: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:25:11 -0500; I like your website but it takes forever to load for those using a modem. We all don't have the high speed. Mike C -- Original Message -- From "Jacques Le Clainche" <hobbycars at cox.net> To: <bugeye; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00128.html (8,575 bytes)
4. Re: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:23:55 -0500; Looks good Jacques, but not all of us have Macromedia Flash loaded. Rick (built with; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00129.html (8,190 bytes)
5. RE: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:56:30 GMT j061uuAC021774; to begin with.... the "Movies" link isn't working but "Around the Block" works. Goin' through the rest of it in time! :) Cap'n Bob '60 Frog; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00130.html (7,546 bytes)
6. RE: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:58:50 -0500; Looks great but for someone with a dial up connection it probably takes forever to open. You need a main page where you can give them a choice of either high or low bandwidth. Dave 60 - 61 - 61 Bugey; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00131.html (8,157 bytes)
7. RE: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:13:53 -0800; Thanks to all who responded for the feedback... Yes, I know some stuff does not work yet, Cap'n Bob, and there are still quite a few "bits" not loaded onto the new website - Just testing the waters,; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00132.html (8,638 bytes)
8. RE: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:32:25 -0800 (PST); Come one Jacques, I know you've made that run faster than eight and a half minutes! AND...why are there no trees on your mountains? In Oregon, we don't allow mountains if they don't have trees. WFO -; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00133.html (8,209 bytes)
9. Re: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:35:44 -0800; Looks great, what a bunch of nice cars. The pictures were not showing up on the main page of the photo album, but when you click on each one they do. So how often do all of you get to drive your cars; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00134.html (7,916 bytes)
10. Re: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:29:42 -0500; Very nice website, Jacques. jay fishbein wallingford, ct http://home.ix.netcom.com/~type79/ <http://home.ix.netcom.com/%7Etype79/>; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00135.html (8,043 bytes)
11. Re[2]: New look Website (JLC)? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:38:44 -0800; Hello WFO, hey! howzit? ... not only do we not allow mountains that don't have trees, we don't allow them to be CALLED mountains if they aren't high enough to have a TIMBERLINE above which trees CAN'; /html/spridgets/2005-01/msg00136.html (8,271 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]