Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+to\s+site\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+to\s+site\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. New to site (score: 1): Author: "Tony Someone" <tonythetiger@onecliq.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:40:10 -0600; To All- Im Tony Lang, I live in Il. bought my first Mk1a in 72'. Im 52 soon. I found this site a couple days ago and am already having a blast and realizing all the potential for learning. Thanks to; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00095.html (8,146 bytes)
2. Re: New to site (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:36:51 -0500; Tony, I will do an article on the weight distribution of the Tiger, but the number of 51%-52% on the front are Wrong. I made a wheel weight system to measure the weight on each wheel, with me and Bud; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00105.html (8,865 bytes)
3. Re: New to site (score: 1): Author: "Chris Thompson" <chris@cthompson.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:31:22 -0500; Larry - I've always been highly suspect of those weight distribution numbers. My guess is that it is much closer to 60% front.... Will be interesting to hear what you measured.... Chris; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00108.html (7,383 bytes)
4. Re: New to site (score: 1): Author: "P. R. Hulse" <phulse@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 19:50:58 -0800; Hi Larry, Neat question. The answer is 53-54% front and 47-46% rear. Of course I don't know how much you or Joe weigh so changes in the CG are difficult to estimate. However, I bet it was heavier on; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00109.html (7,780 bytes)
5. Re: New to site (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 09:59:12 -0500; Sorry Chris, this is not the measurement we got. Larry; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00113.html (7,602 bytes)
6. Re: New to site (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:12:26 -0500; Sorry Philip, this is not the measurement we got. Larry; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00114.html (8,052 bytes)
7. Re: New to site (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 16:54:07 -0500; Philip, these numbers are way off from what we got. I have had one very close estimate so far. Larry; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00123.html (8,060 bytes)
8. Re: New to site (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 16:55:28 -0500; Philip, this is way off from what we got. One answer is very close. Larry; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00124.html (8,035 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]