Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+tube\s+shocks\-\-a\s+report\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+tube\s+shocks\-\-a\s+report\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. New tube shocks--a report (score: 1): Author: ATWEDITOR@aol.com; Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:33:46 -0400; To all-- Remember a while back Kelvin said that Moss discovered the Monroe shocks in the rear tube shock conversion had drifted away from the original spec and that's why everybody hated them, and th; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00152.html (7,397 bytes)
2. Re: New tube shocks--a report (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:38:43 -0700; Hmmm, my tube shock kit didn't require removing the disc shield. What for? Oh, thanks for the report on the new shocks. I'm probably due for replacements. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're nea; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00154.html (7,127 bytes)
3. Re: New tube shocks--a report (score: 1): Author: ATWEDITOR@aol.com; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:24:45 EDT; In a message dated 4/9/2004 3:42:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, mvheim@studiolimage.com writes: Hmmm, my tube shock kit didn't require removing the disc shield. What for? These tude shocks were already; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00199.html (6,974 bytes)
4. Re: New tube shocks--a report (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:30:39 -0700; Mine attach to a stud welded to a plate that runs along the rear edge of the lower arm, so the lower end is pretty far inboard compared to the disc shield. But I understand there are various layouts; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00200.html (7,487 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]