- 1. No, MGs aren't that tough (score: 1)
- Author: WJAD81D@prodigy.com (MR JOHN P ELWOOD)
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 23:04:16 EST
- I have just answered my own question. And, my original note has stirred up a bit more than I have anticipated. Here is what I also have to say, and have said, but perhaps in a better way. I have gone
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00596.html (9,538 bytes)
- 2. Re: No, MGs aren't that tough (score: 1)
- Author: Shel Bercovich <SBERCOVICH@cbe.ab.ca>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 21:26:53 -0700 (MST)
- John, and others: Three things must be remembered here: 1. A lot of the responses to your original post were made "tongue-in-cheek" 2. Not all of us are as logical as others. (some of us may be what
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00597.html (8,040 bytes)
- 3. Re: No, MGs aren't that tough (score: 1)
- Author: NKED65A@prodigy.com ( BOB NOGUEIRA)
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 13:02:15 EST
- -- [ From: Bob Nogueira * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] -- Hey it is the weekend, raining, and since I 'm the only one who hasn't said anything on this topic here is my two cents worth; John is right, but also ha
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00605.html (13,775 bytes)
- 4. Re: No, MGs aren't that tough (score: 1)
- Author: rjfager@ibm.net
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 95 22:08:31 +0800
- I am happy you are 17 and into MGs. Loose the attitude! Some of your points may be valid, but you raise fur when you start pontificating and being disrespectful. This holds true no matter what age y
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00608.html (6,934 bytes)
- 5. Re: No, MGs aren't that tough (score: 1)
- Author: CMaster808@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 1995 11:58:08 -0500
- Calm down, I think theirs just been a miss understanding here? I'm 43 and work construction, when I work on my cars I become frustrated because of the lack of time that I have to devote to any one p
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00620.html (8,037 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu