- 1. No Tiger Content - Your Phone Bill (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 17:06:38 -0800
- Just received my long distance and local phone bill, and was amazed that I owed $5.51 for one 25 cent phone call. The long distance carrier gave me a bunch of lies about those charges, and the local
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00292.html (7,887 bytes)
- 2. Re: No Tiger Content - Your Phone Bill (score: 1)
- Author: "Rich Atherton" <gumby@connectexpress.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 18:28:30 -0800
- If they not a local state company (non Californian for you Laifman's), then you may be able to have them charged with interstate fraud. AND if you can get them to mail you a bill directly, with an ex
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00299.html (7,543 bytes)
- 3. Re: No Tiger Content - Your Phone Bill (score: 1)
- Author: "louabbot" <louabbot@mail.ameritel.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 21:46:38 -0600
- My question is this...I own a business and have refused/cancelled my long distance service entirely, but an STILL charged a monthly fee plus a land line charge. Any ideas? I am getting nowhere with t
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00336.html (9,241 bytes)
- 4. Re: No Tiger content - your phone bill (score: 1)
- Author: "Andy Walker" <awtiger@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 00:04:40 -0600
- **NO ALPINE OR TIGER CONTENT** I believe the charge you are referring to is most likely called the "access line charge." This charge has it's roots (Rootes?) in the original break-up of AT&T back in
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00337.html (14,260 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu