Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Noisy\s+gearbox\?\s+on\s+69\s+MGB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Noisy\s+gearbox\?\s+on\s+69\s+MGB\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: BPearce2001@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:55:05 EST; Hey List, I've been off the list for almost a year and have been lurking for the last couple of months. Most of the familiar names are still here... hi all... Now for the BIG question... Last year wh; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg00929.html (8,601 bytes)
2. RE: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Ken Waringa" <kwaringa@dynsys.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:25:28 -0600; I've seen a lot of responses about off list messages and Kai's TR, but we finally get an honest to god request for info, and I haven't seen any responses. Maybe they've all been off list :) Becky, if; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg00947.html (10,227 bytes)
3. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: S & M Barnes <barnesms@swbell.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:42:59 -0600; I have, would NEVER do it again! <g> The only advice I can offer is to maybe drain the transmission oil and see if there are any nasties in there, bits of bearing, gear teeth etc? MikeB /// /// mgs@; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg00966.html (8,002 bytes)
4. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:27:51 -0000; at replaced the If you can depress the clutch with engine running and engage reverse without an crunching then I would say the clutch and hydraulics are OK, and I would agree with Ken's comment on 1; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg00983.html (9,451 bytes)
5. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: BPearce2001@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:24:05 EST; I have done this and aside from normal "junk", the fluid was clean.... Becky 69B no go :~( /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.); /html/mgs/2001-03/msg00994.html (7,930 bytes)
6. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: jmc <jmc987@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 01 07:40:37 -0800; The recent posts about gearbox noise remind me of a noise from my 3-synchro '67 gearbox makes. (Like I needed to be reminded.) It's from the angle drive that turns the speedo cable. When my old speed; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01032.html (8,440 bytes)
7. RE: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:37:45 -0700; and sunny Yes, Joseph I can help you with your angle drive dilemma. Carefully remove it, and throw it in the San Francisco Bay. Then replace your speedo cable with the longer overdrive style. Be car; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01039.html (8,969 bytes)
8. RE: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: Duinhoven_Hans@emc.com; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:51:38 -0500; Looks like a nice & simple plan, but the room behind the gauge is not overwhelming though. Is a try to lubricate the angle drive worthwhile at first place? Cheers, Hans and sunny Yes, Joseph I can he; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01040.html (9,464 bytes)
9. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: Stuart MacMillan <macmillan@home.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:24:29 -0800; I think you are barking up the wrong tree here. Those angle drives are a worm gear assembly (at least the last one I destroyed was). It's hard to imagine that design and its small size can make enoug; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01043.html (10,060 bytes)
10. RE: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:26:58 -0700; overwhelming though. Lubricating the drive has never been successful for me. YMMV. RE: limited space. I'm not too concerned with originality. I would use the longer cable and run it straight out the; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01044.html (8,867 bytes)
11. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:10:55 -0800; You can get rid of the angle drive by using the longer speedo cable. I believe it is listed for later OD cars. It has enough slack to dispense with the angle drive. On my 66 with a 4-sync OD, it has; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01046.html (9,354 bytes)
12. RE: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:22:54 -0700; attached at the transmission end of the cable. Ya know I think Max is right. However it sounds like from your original post you may have one on your speedo???? New suggestion. Take the angle drive o; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01072.html (9,542 bytes)
13. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:06:40 -0800; What do you have against angle drives? I have one on my OD tranny. I also have a spare. When a brand new (550 miles) speedo cable jammed and took out the tranny drive spindle, the failure was at the; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01085.html (8,908 bytes)
14. RE: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:58:35 -0700; It's an un-lubricated transmission that is prone to failure. Larry Hoy /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.); /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01087.html (8,296 bytes)
15. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:15:37 -0800; Ida no Larry, when I hear the phrase "prone to failure" it makes me think of something with a short life span. Well holy smoke, some of these angle drives have been around for 30 years and still work; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01094.html (8,346 bytes)
16. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: James Nazarian Jr <jamesnazarian@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:43:59 -0700; If I recall correctly (and It has been years since I've looked) there was a screw tapped into the angle drive that you could take out and pump some lube into. -- James Nazarian Jr 71 MGB roadster 71; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01101.html (8,830 bytes)
17. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:41:18 -0800; Charley, I knew some had an angle drive there, but I didn't realize it was a different part than the one on the other end (why is that, I wonder? I suppose because it has to be smaller to fit the cra; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01107.html (9,333 bytes)
18. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Dave Wood" <dwood143@home.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:34:51 -0800; I just replaced the heater valve in my 72 MG a couple of weeks ago. I guess that's the problem, they just wear out after a measly 29 years. I don't think you can repair the leak but go for it if you; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01119.html (7,940 bytes)
19. Re: Noisy gearbox? on 69 MGB (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:46:17 -0800; Hi Max, After I wrote to both you and Larry, I saw that you'd posted about becoming aware of the smaller angle drive at the speedo end. Trouble was, I'd already sent the msg; didn't mean to patronize; /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01130.html (8,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]