Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Not\s+LBC\,\s+but\s+related\s+to\s+MG\s+email\s+lists\s+and\s+the\s+internet\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:02:38 -0600
My two cents. The recent virus that started Saturday nearly shut down the internet. It did this by overloading the system with email and probing calls. I believe we can help the world wide web by mak
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00717.html (9,573 bytes)

2. Re: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: "ptegler@cablespeed" <ptegler@cablespeed.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:16:30 -0500
???????? Try system level . Nothing so wimpy or narrow as a simple email virus! It was code aimed at database driven internet systems and information distribution network architecture. MS SQL databas
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00718.html (9,331 bytes)

3. Re: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:34:50 -0600
Scott McNeally (Sun) had a great comment on this 5+ years ago. He compared a overblown Microsoft email message with fonts and colors and a text message something like : "Let's hvae lunch" spelled inc
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00725.html (9,110 bytes)

4. Re: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: "Bob D." <bobmgtd@insightbb.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:54:03 -0000
Text thrift may indeed be a virtue, but in this day of mpeg, jpeg, streaming video, mp3, internet radio and multi-gigabyte hard drives; our puny little emails must be a drop in the proverbial bit-buc
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00726.html (10,345 bytes)

5. Re: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:42:18 -0800
The attachment stripping mechanism of autox.team.net is brilliant. I am sick of people sending me pictures of a raindrop that they think has a funny shape, or a nail clipping that they found in their
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00730.html (11,450 bytes)

6. Re: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: Ajhsys@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:48:59 EST
- - - - - - - - - - The main reason for stripping attachments is to reduce the likelihood of propagating a virus. I have the lists I moderate set up that way. One worm getting onto a mailing list wit
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00731.html (8,796 bytes)

7. RE: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: "Patton Dickson" <kpdii@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:13:09 -0600
There are guys like me who travel, and the two lists I had with attachments rapidly filled my emails inbox limit. As is, I usually have between 200 and 300 emails when I have been out of town for a w
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00732.html (9,424 bytes)

8. Re: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:35:37 -0600
I run a 56K MODEM. Downloading my email takes long enough as it is, without having to wait for pics of everyone's car, cat, dog, etc, to load. CR /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool ///
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00733.html (8,261 bytes)

9. Re: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:13:14 -0600
My 2 cents again. <<<snip>>> The main reason for stripping attachments is to reduce the likelihood of propagating a virus. <<<snip>>> That's the main reason why the attachment option was deleted from
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00735.html (9,000 bytes)

10. RE: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: "David Randall" <superhoser@cablespeed.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:51:30 -0500
As a Microsoft systems-administrator, please keep the list text-only and strip all attachments. Just because I work on MS systems doesn't mean I think they're efficient in any way :) At work we set o
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00738.html (10,367 bytes)

11. Re: Not LBC, but related to MG email lists and the internet (score: 1)
Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Bob D. SEZ - It's not frugality, it's common courtesy. It's rude to broadcast binary files on a mailing list. If you have something to share, put it on a web site and mail the URL. Converseley, offer
/html/mgs/2003-01/msg00749.html (9,199 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu