Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Nuts\s+and\s+Grease\s+Gun\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Nuts\s+and\s+Grease\s+Gun\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: yd3@nvc.net; Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:56:41 -0800; If you would like to see a better chart of the differences between American National (SAE now) and British thread sizes, try this. http://www.justbrits.com/Articles/thread.html Regards, Blake; /html/mgs/2005-03/msg00005.html (6,292 bytes)
2. Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: MICHAEL JONES <jonesmp@prodigy.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:07:54 -0800 (PST); Has anyone used SAE SS nuts on the BSF bolts? According to my book, the only differance is the SAE has a deeper thread depth, which means it should work. Am I right? The grease gun that came with the; /html/mgs/2005-02/msg00257.html (7,154 bytes)
3. Re: Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@MGAguru.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:51:07 -0600; Yes. SAE and BSF fasteners are generally interchangeable (with the same thread pitch). Most people don't know the difference, and perhaps most people assume they are all UNF standard threads, (which; /html/mgs/2005-02/msg00259.html (7,902 bytes)
4. Re: Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: yd3@nvc.net; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:06:47 -0800; Whoops. The first column of the chart should read UNC/ANC. I wrote ANF for the ANC. Otherwise the data is correct. Regards, Blake; /html/mgs/2005-02/msg00273.html (6,842 bytes)
5. Re: Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: "Phil Bates" <jello@ida.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:12:10 -0700 (MST); I'm assuming that by saying SS, you mean stainless steel. I would not use stainless on anything structural/load bearing - i.e. not on mounts or suspension or engine parts. They don't have the right s; /html/mgs/2005-02/msg00274.html (7,623 bytes)
6. RE: Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: yd3 <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:38:37 -0600; Bulloney. For some reason my email isn't going through even though it wasn't a forward, reply, etc. but a new message. Consequently, I'm sending it from webmail this time. <<<Snip>>>; /html/mgs/2005-02/msg00280.html (8,896 bytes)
7. Re: Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: "Rich C" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:11:03 -0500; I'm quite sure that in the British motor industry by 1956 about the only things going out the door on a BMC product still using BSF threads were S.U. parts (fuel pump and carbs). Certainly the rest o; /html/mgs/2005-02/msg00282.html (9,230 bytes)
8. Re: Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: Aaron Whiteman <awhitema@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:22:45 -0800; Ah yes. Exceptions. For example, the thread on the posts that hold the gauges into the dash of my '75 B is some sort of BSF (standard fine did *not* work). When one of the nuts holding my speedo disa; /html/mgs/2005-02/msg00283.html (7,749 bytes)
9. Re: Nuts and Grease Gun (score: 1): Author: Charles Hill <candahill@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:26:24 -0600; What charts show SAE and BSF having the same threads? They are not at all the same. BSF have Whitworth wrench size heads and the thread pitch on most sizes are completely different. Probably the size; /html/mgs/2005-02/msg00288.html (7,222 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]