Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*O\/K\s+T\/R\s+6\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*O\/K\s+T\/R\s+6\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. O/K T/R 6 (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:49:34 -0500; I also agree with Andy 100%, but most people seem to forget how these cars received the very bad rep from back then !!! They were bought as a throw away brand new car by a large group of college kids; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00827.html (6,696 bytes)
2. Re: O/K T/R 6 (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 16:11:28 EST; And I, in turn, agree with Fred. At least that was true of the cars as they progressed from first to second owners and beyond. Keep in mind, too, that the cars that remain today likely a: were pamper; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00829.html (7,894 bytes)
3. Re: O/K T/R 6 (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 21:29:04 -0000 g1GLWZN04791; -- Original Message -- From <ZoboHerald at aol.com> Hi Andy, While it's fair to say that my own stocks mean I'm rarely waiting for parts for the Triumphs, we recently had to wait 10 days to receive a; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00830.html (7,480 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]