Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*O\.D\.\s+Top\s+loader\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*O\.D\.\s+Top\s+loader\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. O.D. Top loader (score: 1): Author: "Parlee, Brad (IndSys,SLS)" <brad.parlee@indsys.ge.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 08:32:06 -0500; If I happen to be looking at a top loader, what would it say on it to indicate an overdrive model? Unfortunately they are probably all "big eared" up front right? The SOS at st. Helens was a great su; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00329.html (6,992 bytes)
2. Re: O.D. Top loader (score: 1): Author: "John Crawley" <johnc@nait.ab.ca>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:22:28 -0700; The best clue is measure the tail shaft housing it is 2 iches shorter that the TIGERs. Yes they are big eared but can be drilled to fit the earlier bellhousing.; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00336.html (6,829 bytes)
3. Re: O.D. Top loader (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:32:01 -0800; Brad, Yes, they will have the wide "big ears", BUT, they have the small ones too. They will bolt right on to your stock 5 bolt bell housing, providing: 1) You change the front bearing retainer to the; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00338.html (8,518 bytes)
4. Re: O.D. Top loader (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 23:03:14 -0500; Brad, My clue (that I didn't understand) was that the "3rd" gear was much smaller (21 teeth) than the Tiger II which had 25 teeth. Otherwise look at he tag for a RUGBP LGO 07RAA 1048 That is what is; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00367.html (7,672 bytes)
5. Re: O.D. Top loader (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 23:18:15 -0500; .... Steve, The SROD transmission mount is the same distance from the front of the transmission as the Tiger II transmission. I moved the motor back to make up for the shorter tailpiece and as a resu; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00368.html (7,704 bytes)
6. Re: O.D. Top loader (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 00:29:01 EST; I know I am coming in very late in this thread. Isn't the SROD transmission a relatively weak piece? I thought the transmission was rated at something like 275 ft/lbs. torque capacity... How is that; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00369.html (6,871 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]