Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*O\.T\.\s+\-\s+Z\s+Concept\-\-Blahhhhhh\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*O\.T\.\s+\-\s+Z\s+Concept\-\-Blahhhhhh\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: Alex Avery <aavery@rica.net>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 10:03:59 -0500; Sorry, but the new 350z design is uninspired. My father's first comment sums it up--"a lump." The "New Beetle" set the standard for good retro design. The Audi TT set a new standard for simply inspir; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00258.html (8,995 bytes)
2. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: aryasura <aryasu19@idt.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:23:08 -0500 (EST); Looks kind of like an angular TT. The only thing I like about it is the fact that they kept it small (and hopefully light) as opposed to the 300Z. Unless they put turbos in it to make it a contender; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00259.html (9,808 bytes)
3. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: Michael Poorboy <bitterrootprop@nidlink.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 07:32:02 -0800; I agree with you. I am not very happy with the new look. I did like the little video clip they had on the Z history set to music. http://63.92.193.139/future_driven/video1.html You will have to pick; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00261.html (9,929 bytes)
4. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: Don Miller <turbospl311@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 07:39:46 -0800 (PST); I beg to differ on this car. Your 3rd Gen is a much better car than this. At 4000 lbs it is not a Ferrari killer. It is not even a Datsun Roadster killer. At the last autocross of the season this pa; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00262.html (10,952 bytes)
5. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: shifty <shifty@best.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 07:54:47 -0800; Yep, I'm I'm afraid it's a real loser. The back end is sort of Porsche-like. The front air intake (would you call it a grille?) is just ugly. Uninspired, and I'm sure the price tag will be north of $; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00264.html (7,876 bytes)
6. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: Thomas the Swede <csp311@telia.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 16:56:33 +0100; Nissan should call 1-800-design-resque or take a look here. Just make it a little smaller and lighter. Thomas; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00267.html (9,632 bytes)
7. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: Ronnie Day <ronday@home.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:14:02 -0600; At least it would appear that Nissan's aware of the significance of the older cars and the activity of the Z clubs. I agree that the new car leaves a lot to be desired. Even when I was much younger; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00269.html (8,940 bytes)
8. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: Gary McCormick <svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 08:19:13 -0800; Ironically, the demise of the 300ZX and the 3rd generation RX-7 came about declining sales after their price tags headed north of $30k - then a couple of years later, BMW Z3s and Porsche Boxsters wer; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00270.html (8,368 bytes)
9. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: Thomas the Swede <csp311@telia.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:29:07 +0100; I think it have to do with the name BMW or Porsche as their other cars are more towards the expensive end of the market. Lexus and Toyota is the same car but with different marketing strategy. I dont; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00273.html (8,884 bytes)
10. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:33:13 -0500; Nissans and Mazdas are not in the same "league" as Porsche and BMW and don't appeal to the Yuppies and wannabes as do the latter 2. FWIW, the 300Zs and RX7s and Supras were in the 40s when they implo; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00283.html (9,080 bytes)
11. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: snyler <marc@animalfirm.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:31:17 -0600; Thomas, Don't rub it in! What a beautiful automobile! One more reason to leave the US ;-) -marc == Marc Tyler Designer, Animal Firm 830-324-6578 www.animalfirm.com; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00311.html (8,122 bytes)
12. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: snyler <marc@animalfirm.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:31:18 -0600; Hmm, could it be the ragtop thing? -marc == Marc Tyler Designer, Animal Firm 830-324-6578 www.animalfirm.com; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00312.html (8,195 bytes)
13. Re: O.T. - Z Concept--Blahhhhhh (score: 1): Author: <eddie@ratdat.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:24:51 -0000; Being as how there are a lot of opinions flying about on this Z concept I thought I'd put a little poll on my site at www.ratdat.com For the record, I think it's horrible. It's an Audi TT mixed with; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-01/msg00318.html (8,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]