Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*OD\s+tranny\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*OD\s+tranny\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: OD tranny (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:53:50 -0700; James--Sorry if there's confusion, but certain Toyota trannies will only bolt up to the TR engine when the "conversion" kit is used. Among other parts, this includes the special bell housing and rear; /html/6pack/2004-09/msg00036.html (7,610 bytes)
2. Re: OD tranny (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:37:43 -0700; Paul--I don't know if the TR6 tranny will bolt right up to the TR3 engine, but I'm pretty sure the 5 speed Toyota Celica box *will. Herman van der Akker handhvan@msn.com says he put his *conversion k; /html/6pack/2004-08/msg00404.html (6,807 bytes)
3. OD tranny (score: 1): Author: "Eric Myracle" <eric_myracle@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:38:47 -0400; Hello list. As I was driving around with the top down today I thought "it sure would be nice to have overdrive on this thing". How much work and cost is it to retrofit a non-OD TR6 (1970 model) to ha; /html/6pack/2002-06/msg00269.html (7,020 bytes)
4. RE: OD tranny (score: 1): Author: "Vink, Graham" <vinkg@fleishman.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:20:58 -0500; I was going to do this on my '69, and it's definitely do-able. but you need to find a used/rebuilt combination tranny and O/D, which can be hard to do if you don't have an o/d core. the rest of the s; /html/6pack/2002-06/msg00278.html (8,538 bytes)
5. Re: OD tranny (score: 1): Author: "Todd Bermudez" <red_tr250@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:27:13 -0400; IMHO, O/D is a must! Having just installed a J-Type O/D Transmission in my TR250, I wouldn't have it any other way. You can install an Overdrive on your existing tranny, but you're talkin' about sev; /html/6pack/2002-06/msg00279.html (8,595 bytes)
6. Fwd: OD tranny (score: 1): Author: Timothy Holbrook <tjh173@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:32:33 -0700 (PDT); As others have stated, it's much easier to pick up a gearbox that already has o/d on it. Bolting an o/d unit to your non-o/d gearbox is harder than it sounds. It requires a new mainshaft, because o/d; /html/6pack/2002-06/msg00289.html (8,783 bytes)
7. Re: OD tranny (score: 1): Author: "Eric Myracle" <eric_myracle@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 21:44:10 -0400; But wouldn't a tranny + OD use a shorter driveshaft than a tranny without OD? Eric you need to do harnesses (easy to solenoid, and less I transmission of the just one '63 cars. Plus transmission, bec; /html/6pack/2002-06/msg00582.html (9,470 bytes)
8. Re: OD tranny (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Riedel" <Nelson@buckeyetriumphs.org>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:22:28 -0400; No, same propeller shaft. Nelson; /html/6pack/2002-06/msg00583.html (6,730 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]