Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Octain\s+\(sic\)\s+booster\s+\[OT\s+lead\s+rant\]\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 16:43:48 -0700
Frankly, I think they are all eligible for a big fat fine, and deservedly so. Lead is a poison, is absorbed in the tissues, and is particularly damaging to developing bodies. Just because you as an a
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg00941.html (9,248 bytes)

2. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 09:13:26 -0400
I rarely rise to such dialogue but I am, and if I that makes me a do-gooder then so be it. I love the way so many people turn a blind eye to their particular interest be it cars, gardening, snowmobil
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg00961.html (10,378 bytes)

3. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: Dan Dwelley <ddwelley@excite.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Ok...Lets take a step back. Generally, people gravitate to one side of the spectrum or the other. The term Tree hugger or do gooder basically is a stereo-type for the extreme. I think we all agree th
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg00966.html (12,456 bytes)

4. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: "wcameyer" <wcameyer@email.msn.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 10:43:08 -0700
How true. Instead of griping about "tree huggers", we should be considering and appreciating the benefits of clean air, water, food,........... -- Original Message -- From: "Barrie Robinson" <barrier
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg00967.html (11,179 bytes)

5. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: "James H. Nazarian, Ph.D." <microdoc@apk.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:45:30 -0400
At least some of the octane booster products on the market are lead free. All ecologically conscious MG folks can use those brands if they feel the necessity to use anything. Why not buy 94 octane u
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg00979.html (9,940 bytes)

6. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 15:32:13 -0400
Ever thought why Mexico and other foreign countries "spew chemicals". Well it's because they are hard at work making plastic toys to be sold at hamburger joints, carpet material for SUVs, plastic law
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg00983.html (14,060 bytes)

7. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 21:42:09 -0700
FWIW: I'll add my two cents. Anybody out there own a Ford Expidition AND uses leaded gas in their MG? I should hope not. While lead could be a problem, it only BECAME a problem because of the lack of
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg00999.html (8,920 bytes)

8. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: mup1dm <mup1dm@surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 May 00 12:40:29 +0100
In a quick search using "google" I found the following very interesting FAQ about motor fuel, octane ratings, lead, and additives: http://repairfaq.org/filipg/AUTO/F_Gasoline.html It assumes that mos
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01002.html (8,789 bytes)

9. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: "James H. Nazarian, Ph.D." <microdoc@apk.net>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 08:53:21 -0400
You made some good points. May I suggest that another factor contributing to our cars passing pollution tests is the 10%, or so, of ethanol that is diluting the gasoline we buy. So, without doing th
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01007.html (9,886 bytes)

10. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: Dan Dwelley <ddwelley@excite.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 06:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Hey!!! Look at my earlier posts before you barade me! My point was to the tree huggers that we are ALL guilty of pollution!!! Freaken read the posts...SLOWLY IF YOU MUST!!! NOW...CAN WE PLEASE START
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01008.html (15,577 bytes)

11. Re: Octain (sic) booster [OT lead rant] (score: 1)
Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 10:40:55 -0700
This discussion might die out on its own if it were not for certain persons consistently using inflammatory phrases like "tree huggers" and "Green Pease (sic) Bull Shit". Please, all parties, try to
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01033.html (17,377 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu