Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oil\s+Pan\s+stuff\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oil\s+Pan\s+stuff\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Oil Pan stuff (score: 1): Author: "Tim Ronak" <timinvan@fox.nstn.ca>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 07:45:04 -0600; Did I read correctly that you went to a front sump pan? The reason I ask is that i am new to Ford stuff, having been a Chevy guy...forever. The reason I ask is that I am curious if now under extende; /html/tigers/1999-07/msg00143.html (6,924 bytes)
2. Re: Oil Pan stuff (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:53:11 -0400; I have 3 vertical baffles plus one horizontial baffel in the new pan that slows the oil flow to the rear. Even with a 351C I can brake harder than I can accelerate. I also brake hard more often than; /html/tigers/1999-07/msg00155.html (9,572 bytes)
3. Re: Oil Pan stuff (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:03:43 -0400; Tim, The front sump of the 351C pan is 7 3/4" deep. I now have the pan 7 3/4" deep full length. I couldn't get past all the crap in my garage to measure the original Tiger II 289 pan, but it appears; /html/tigers/1999-07/msg00160.html (8,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]