- 1. Oil pressure sender data (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:42:09 -0500
- As previously mentioned to the list, I converted my oil pressure gauge from a mechanical to an electric some time back. The only problem is that the look is quite different. Also the lighting is actu
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg00987.html (7,648 bytes)
- 2. Oil pressure sender data (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:20:08 -0500
- Message text written by Mark Hooper bad think I. Then I checked out the required sender (PTR1810-1-10) and it's $96.00 !!! Since when is the cheap SOB sender 2X more expensive than the show piece gau
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg01019.html (7,957 bytes)
- 3. RE: Oil pressure sender data (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 07:59:12 -0800
- There's no complete standard anyway, when the oil sender on my Chevy failed, I found that the original sender was NLA and current replacements made the gage read roughly 25% low. Among the GM sender
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg01021.html (7,430 bytes)
- 4. RE: Oil pressure sender data (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:32:41 -0500
- Message text written by "Randall Young" failed, I found that the original sender was NLA and current replacements made the gage read roughly 25% low. Among the GM senders, there is apparently a stand
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg01025.html (7,537 bytes)
- 5. RE: Oil pressure sender data (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:27:23 -0600
- For what it may be worth I have been slowly collecting the pieces I need to do what you are wanting to do Dave. I bought a PTR1810-1-10 on eBay for significantly less than $96. It was listed as a Lan
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg01026.html (7,615 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu