Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Optimum\s+Compression\s+Ratio\-\-TR4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Optimum\s+Compression\s+Ratio\-\-TR4\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Optimum Compression Ratio--TR4 (score: 1): Author: Chasgee@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 20:38:43 EST; Being a Spitfire racer that regularly competes with TR4s, I recommend between 7 and 8:1 :))) Chuck; /html/fot/1998-11/msg00065.html (6,598 bytes)
2. Re: Optimum Compression Ratio--TR4 (score: 1): Author: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 22:21:42 -0500 (EST); Perfect, especially when paired with a nice "matched-to-ports" Vanguard manifold and single Solex carburetor. But what kind of carburetion did the Ferguson tractors use? Those really "pulled".... --A; /html/fot/1998-11/msg00066.html (7,509 bytes)
3. Re: Optimum Compression Ratio--TR4 (score: 1): Author: TRBILBO@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 05:18:52 EST; Chuck...And the 4 will still be faster than the blue streak Spitfire. Sure you didn't mean to include running RN9 plugs, 0 degree timing, 60 octane fuel and 20 psi in the redline tires? Yeah...I know; /html/fot/1998-11/msg00067.html (7,015 bytes)
4. Re: Optimum Compression Ratio--TR4 (score: 1): Author: Malaboge@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 20:46:35 EST; Opinions...they're just like, well you know, and everybody's got one, here's mine...just remember, you get what you pay for. <Personal Opinion Mode On> I have seen several different ways of obtaining; /html/fot/1998-11/msg00087.html (10,970 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]