Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Options\s+for\s+lowering\s+CO\s+$emissions$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Options\s+for\s+lowering\s+CO\s+$emissions$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Options for lowering CO (emissions) (score: 1): Author: "Mike Janacek" <mjanacek@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 18:00:33 -0400; Car specs: '79B with rebuilt non-biased HS4's. No cat (obviously). Last week: Car failed on CO percentage (5.06 percent). My CO meter showed only 2 percent at idle although state does a rolling road; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00198.html (7,613 bytes)
2. Re: Options for lowering CO (emissions) (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 16:10:48 -0700; Hmmm, my 66 (when it was still required to be tested) used to pass the CA idle (1200rpm max) and 2500 rpm tests, and it had no smog gear at all. The CO limits were 5.5% and 4.5%, respectively, but my; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00206.html (8,800 bytes)
3. Re: Options for lowering CO (emissions) (score: 1): Author: Michael Jose <mwjose@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 16:22:23 -0700; I've had trouble enough getting my car to pass every year. I too have a 79, but I have the ZS and a cat and a new air pump and gulp valve and egr etc. After a tuneup and leaning out the carb some I; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00208.html (7,749 bytes)
4. Re: Options for lowering CO (emissions) (score: 1): Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>; Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 17:29:41 -0600; Are you testing on fresh oil and making sure the car is good and hot from a road drive? Made a difference for me. I have also heard from an emission station guy not to use the platinum plugs if your; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00209.html (8,276 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]