Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Or\s+maybe\s+not\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+I\'m\s+full\s+of\s+\$\#1\^\.\.\.\s+\:\-\)\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Or\s+maybe\s+not\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+I\'m\s+full\s+of\s+\$\#1\^\.\.\.\s+\:\-\)\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Or maybe not, was Re: I'm full of $#1^... :-) (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 15:09:14 EDT; << Simply not true! The rpm spacing between gears is determined only by the transmission ratios. I had recently used the analogy of a 10-speed bicycle, but here the ratio change (front sprockets) is; /html/spridgets/1999-04/msg01641.html (8,831 bytes)
2. Re: Or maybe not, was Re: I'm full of $#1^... :-) (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 14:25:47 -0700; There is more to it then this... remind me wed and I will explain my theory on Trans ratios.... and rear gears... Land speed racing is absolutely about gears and rear ratio's as well as Peak Rpm and; /html/spridgets/1999-04/msg01644.html (10,161 bytes)
3. Re: Or maybe not, was Re: I'm full of $#1^... :-) (score: 1): Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT); I don't quite follow. You calculate mph/rpm in 3rd and 4th gears, but how do you get to the rpm increase in the last line? Also, let me try to make my point logically. I am in 3rd gear and accelerat; /html/spridgets/1999-04/msg01659.html (10,741 bytes)
4. Re: Or maybe not, was Re: I'm full of $#1^... :-) (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 16:14:26 -0700; okay now add in your Hp and Torque curves and you got it down pat.... Shift at 6% past max hp and into the heart of your torque curve you are going to go as fast as that motor and frontal area will a; /html/spridgets/1999-04/msg01661.html (12,349 bytes)
5. Re: Or maybe not, was Re: I'm full of $#1^... :-) (score: 1): Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT); I'm from Germany and back in the energy saving days, I remember reading test on plenty of cars that would reach their Vmax in 4th rather than 5th. 5th was just too long for performance, as you descr; /html/spridgets/1999-04/msg01663.html (13,898 bytes)
6. Re: Or maybe not, was Re: I'm full of $#1^... :-) (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 18:07:23 EDT; << stuff to much overdrive on a small motor and it will go faster and run better in 4th then in 5thOD. >> But isn't 4th direct drive and thereby suffers less power drop than 5th which is indirect? Da; /html/spridgets/1999-04/msg01666.html (7,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]