Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Original\s+Equipment\s+Radios\s+NOW\s+Requirement\s+to\s+Post\s+to\s+List\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: "Feldman, Jack (Jack)" <jack@lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 07:22:31 -0500
Our server was off line for four days because of the virus. What a relief from email. Unfortunately they saved it up and dumped four days worth in one day. I deleted a number of digests, but the ones
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00363.html (10,739 bytes)

2. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: Ray Wygonik <rwygonik@grove.iup.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 08:54:57 -0400
Jack, not sure if I missed the humor in your post or not. I have been on and off the list for about 2 years now. Everything seems fine to me. I have most of the reference material you listed, but oft
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00367.html (12,297 bytes)

3. RE: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: Nory P <nory_midget@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 08:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
down to a dozen. This is true and I, too, find it frustrating to see the same subject come up every couple of months, but in defense of those individuals asking the questions, we must remember a few
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00373.html (10,589 bytes)

4. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: Ray Wygonik <rwygonik@grove.iup.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 12:44:14 -0400
Not to beat a dead horse, but maybe we should forbid posts that include poetry and comments on the lovely spring day. After all if we want poetry we can go to the library or join a literary list, rig
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00375.html (8,511 bytes)

5. RE: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: "Proudfoot, Andrew" <proudfa@NAVCANADA.CA>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:58:00 -0400
Of course if we followed all these rules we wouldn't have a list of any substance Now would we? Sometimes things don't apply to you at the time thus you ask the same questions later and now the list
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00376.html (11,276 bytes)

6. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: Ray Wygonik <rwygonik@grove.iup.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 13:01:06 -0400
Amen Andy I have met so many colorful personalities on the list, though I have never actually met them. That's what it is all about! --Original Message-- From: Proudfoot, Andrew <proudfa@NAVCANADA.CA
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00377.html (12,438 bytes)

7. RE: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: "Feldman, Jack (Jack)" <jack@lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 05:51:09 -0500
Automobile FM adapters were big when FM was first introduced into cars. They consist of a small (depending on where on the technology curve they were built) box with an FM dial and tuning knob. Mine
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00423.html (11,416 bytes)

8. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: PBcrispie@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 01:13:50 EDT
I totally agree with Nory on not making requirements for postings. For example, I'm an 18 year old, buying his first car ('78 B) this monday. without the list and its wisdom, i never would have known
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00538.html (8,961 bytes)

9. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: Mgbreh@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 01:19:38 EDT
I wish when i was 18 that i knew how cool Mg's were i would not have had to wait til i was 28 to get my first one good luck. Ray Huff soon to be 4 mgb's ONE VERY COOL UNDERSTANDING WIFE Vp MGCCNWC no
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00539.html (8,368 bytes)

10. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: Charles Hill <candahill@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:40:32 -0500
The biggest improvement I can see for the list would be for the participants to turn of the "quote previous message" option on their email software. This would save a lot of reading time and bandwidt
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00577.html (8,904 bytes)

11. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:54:07 -0400
I think this would be a VERY unpopular method. Obviously some quoting gets to extreme, but some is a must. Who has a photographic memory of all messages, and can instantly recall any topic in detal?
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00579.html (9,558 bytes)

12. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@tradesrv.com.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 14:57:16 +1000
Hi all, Actually, the correct ettiquette is to cut and paste small, relevant portions of the Email you are referencing. That way people can see exactly what is is your are replying to. It is simply b
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00580.html (9,639 bytes)

13. Re: Original Equipment Radios NOW Requirement to Post to List (score: 1)
Author: Robert Alan Reisse <rareisse@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 14:49:24 -0400
I am really opposed to deleting the orginal message as long as one is reply to a direct inquiry. It certainly makes it simplier to save one message then to try and scan back through the messages to f
/html/mgs/1999-04/msg00612.html (9,606 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu