Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Originality\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Originality\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. re: originality (score: 1): Author: Rande Bellman <rande@thecia.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 23:27:21 -0400; This is probably going to be the only time you and I will disagree. We both saw the Miles car at Big Sky shortly after Bo had finished his no-shortcuts restoration of it, and it looked awesome, and; /html/tigers/2005-08/msg00021.html (7,814 bytes)
2. Re: originality (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 23:00:43 -0600; Hi Rande, I don't disagree with your assessment of the Miles Tiger, or of Bo Cheadle's efforts, one bit. I overheard parts of his conversations with others, including Dick Barker, where they swapped; /html/tigers/2005-08/msg00022.html (9,228 bytes)
3. re: originality (score: 1): Author: Rande Bellman <rande@thecia.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:03:29 -0400; "All of these non-original things are restorable, but it's also part of what makes my Tiger what it is - it's all the things that it's been over the last 39 years, for the other owners, and for me. T; /html/tigers/2005-08/msg00032.html (7,690 bytes)
4. Originality (score: 1): Author: Matthew P Bouchelle <mbouchel@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 21:27:08 -0400; I was surfing Norman Miller's web site last night looking at B9471978 at www.best.com/~rootes1/forsalea.htm and decided that it was time to air some questions about original finishes under the hood.; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00045.html (7,963 bytes)
5. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 22:50:57 -0700; I believe you are essentially correct that the black finishes in restored cars in general, and this one in particular, are much shinier than the "black" and especially the "satin black" finishes the; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00047.html (10,440 bytes)
6. Originality (score: 1): Author: Matthew P Bouchelle <mbouchel@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 20:50:54 -0400; Thanks for all the answers regarding originality under the hood. If I've got it I would say that the fan shroud, generator and bracket were semi gloss or satin black. I'll use the same color as a 65-; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00061.html (7,788 bytes)
7. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 20:57:08 -0700; There were (at least) two different black finishes used, satin and what I would call a semi-gloss black. For example, the generator per se is satin black, but the bracket is semi-gloss. Some of these; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00062.html (9,229 bytes)
8. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: dondaves@ix.netcom.com; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 01:28:31 -0500 (CDT); When I restored the engine compartment of our old 64 1/2 Mustang a decade ago (260 equipped), my research showed that the earliest Mustang V8 motors were painted black with the valve covers and air f; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00094.html (8,115 bytes)
9. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 11:48:38 -0700; I used to work with someone who bought one of the first Mustangs. He called it a "'65". I pointed out it must have been a "64". He argued vehemently that there were no "64" Mustangs. Well, OK then "; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00098.html (11,708 bytes)
10. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 15:03:55 EDT; << It looks to me like the color of the engines is not part of the documentation supplied by Ford. It seems surprising to me that the color change from black to blue would not have been uniform for a; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00100.html (8,927 bytes)
11. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 12:49:39 -0700; Not sure whether you are still skeptical or not, and heck, I only know what I read. However, I believe Norm would be the first to admit that his historical information has expanded over the years. H; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00103.html (9,956 bytes)
12. Originality (score: 1): Author: BOBCARNUT@aol.com; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 17:06:00 EDT; For whatever it's worth, the 260 engine in the 64-1/2 Mustang we purchased new in June of 1964 and just sold 1 year ago (to pay for our Tiger) had a black block with blue valve covers and air cleaner; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00104.html (7,874 bytes)
13. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: randya@pacbell.net; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 00:22:03 -0700; According to the Book of Norman, block color is Black up to B382000600, andOld Ford Dark Blue after that (pp. 144, 145). - Randy Antosiak; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00107.html (8,469 bytes)
14. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: dondaves@ix.netcom.com; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 04:09:04 -0500 (CDT); Bob, Ford didn't market the first Mustangs as '64 or '64 1/2. They were all '65 models and production for that year ran about 18 months. The VIN numbers identified them all as '65's. The 64 1/2 desig; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00108.html (8,737 bytes)
15. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 10:33:33 -0700; Kind of like Mk I's and Mk Ia's is guess. Thanks for setting the record straight for me. I guess I owe Jerry an apology next time is see him. ;-) Brgds, Bob Robert L. Palmer UCSD, Dept. of AMES 619-; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00111.html (9,293 bytes)
16. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 16:24:02 -0700; Just my two cents worth on the "1964 1/2" Mustang. I was vacationing in Coranado Island in the summer of '64, when Ford announced their new Mustang. As I recall, the ads, and commentary, definitely c; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00113.html (9,412 bytes)
17. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: JHef101@aol.com; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 22:51:52 EDT; For what its worth, As a newly minted driver in 1970 I owned a 1965 Mustang 260 coupe which was titled as a 1965, but was presented by the seller as a 64 1/2 . I also remember Ford advertising them a; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00116.html (8,386 bytes)
18. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:11:06 -0700; Jeff, Dave, et Guys, Ok, so I had to look into this myself. If you hie yourself down to: http://www.fordheritage.com/mustang/media/1960shock.html (You need to download ShockWave) you can check out Fo; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00117.html (9,458 bytes)
19. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: B&C Mustang <info@bcmustang.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 08:15:17 +0000; check our web site for more infomation on 64.5 mustangs. chris m williams; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00121.html (8,087 bytes)
20. Re: Originality (score: 1): Author: B&C Mustang <info@bcmustang.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 08:19:30 +0000; and for the record the only mustang that had 15 inch wheels 65/66 was a very few 289 hipo mustang i have only seen one. early cars chris m williams; /html/tigers/1999-10/msg00123.html (8,150 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]