Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Parts\s+cars\s+for\s+my\s+BMH\s+body\s+shell\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:18:06 -0400
Thanks for all the responses on my previous question about gauge rebuilding. The information was great. I have contacted mo-ma and nisonger, and have been paying more attention to eBay. I would like
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00382.html (8,901 bytes)

2. RE: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:13:23 -0700
The BMH bodyshell is going to have the incorrect transmission tunnel and dash mounting area to be a 1967. The rest of the car is close enough to fiddle with, but these areas are going to require sur
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00433.html (9,829 bytes)

3. Re: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:36:00 -0400
Hi Kelvin, Thanks for the reply. The BMH web site said my body shell was for 67-74, but the commission numbers they list are for 68-74. I guess the first 68 was built in 10/67, so that's why they sai
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00434.html (11,631 bytes)

4. Re: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:40:58 -0700
I believe the body shells use the second-generation tooling (68-74), so that it would be difficult to install a 67 dash; but ask Kelvin. The running gear shouldn't be any problem, as you can get the
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00435.html (9,693 bytes)

5. RE: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:12:38 -0700
No problem with your notion. The car you want to build is quite achievable. My suggestion is to build a 1969 MGB with a 1967 dash, interior and complete wiring harness. Mechanically the car will be
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00439.html (11,362 bytes)

6. Re: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: Chris Thompson <chris-mg@cthompson.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:36:17 -0400
Tony Barnhill has a page about installing a 64 dash in a 70 BGT, not sure if GT vs. Roadster is different enough to care, but he's got some photos... http://www.theautoist.com/installing1964dash.htm
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00440.html (8,759 bytes)

7. RE: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:40:29 -0700
There ya go. God, I love the internet. GT to roadster is only slightly different, the reinforcing underneath is the only thing I can think of. thanks Chris. Kelvin. btw. I got involved in this as a
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00442.html (8,390 bytes)

8. RE: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Vanner" <phil@outtech.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:39:22 -0500
You might try to contact British Wiring. I have a mixed-year car (early Spridget, with alternator conversion and electric tach and fuel pump) I described my features and they made me a custom harnes
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00443.html (8,785 bytes)

9. Re: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:29:22 -0400
Hi Kelvin, Chris, and Max Thanks for the reply. Maybe this will work in the end. The pictures from Chris helped a lot. I'll print them out and study my body shell. The 69 parts cars have reclining se
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00448.html (13,230 bytes)

10. RE: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:15:13 -0700
Don et al: My apologeticals for slightly incorrect info on the seat fitments. It's been a long time since I played with the 69 specific seat. The seat foam is the same as a 70-72, but the back foam
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00457.html (8,803 bytes)

11. Re: Parts cars for my BMH body shell (score: 1)
Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:01:03 -0400
Hi Kelvin, Another list member has written: "About the seats, the leather '63-'67 seat covers fit on all seat frames through '74, with or without headrests. If you don't want headrests on the seats t
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00465.html (9,579 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu