- 1. Passing gas- an exhaustive study (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Eastman <william.eastman@medtronic.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 13:04:20 -0600
- I have been watching this thread for a while and have now decided to pitch in with my two cents. I have simplified quite a bit in this diatribe so it isn't perfect but is does show trends and orders
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01530.html (10,796 bytes)
- 2. Re: Passing gas- an exhaustive study (score: 1)
- Author: Sean Bartnik <sbart7kb@www.mwc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 98 14:44:02 EST
- I'm posting this to the list so that if I make an ass of myself, at least I will do it properly -- in front of hundreds of people :-) I don't believe it's physically possible to have more molecules
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01532.html (8,342 bytes)
- 3. Re: Passing gas- an exhaustive study (score: 1)
- Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 15:59:47 -0500
- But remember, petrol goes in not as a gas but as a vapour, which is technically particles of liquid suspended in air. The liquid petrol is MUCH more dense than the gas exhaust. Much like boiling wate
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01536.html (8,144 bytes)
- 4. Re: Passing gas- an exhaustive study (score: 1)
- Author: Kenneth Scott <KSCOTT@HOLYCROSS.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 16:13:10 -0500
- Sorry, hit the send button too soon. Didn't mean to send without signature (rude). Atoms are conserved. Molecules are not. Two hydrogen molecules + one oxygen molecule yield (upon combustion) two wat
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01538.html (7,221 bytes)
- 5. Re: Passing gas- an exhaustive study (score: 1)
- Author: Art Pfenninger <ch155@FreeNet.Buffalo.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 06:43:16 -0500 (EST)
- Say what? ...Art
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01585.html (11,737 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu