Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Performer\,\s+F4B\,\s+Which\s+Manifold\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Performer\,\s+F4B\,\s+Which\s+Manifold\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: RSpontelli@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 01:05:46 EDT; Unless you're talking 'bout a LeftCoast Tigers United-type event. In that case, full-on HiPo 289s, quick-steer racks, and suspensions mods up the ying-yang are all fine and dandy in the "stock" class; /html/tigers/2001-10/msg00001.html (6,932 bytes)
2. RE: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Robert L." <RPalmer@brobeck.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:32:30 -0700; If you are referring to Tom's motor, he says he may have a HiPo cam, which I believe was available as a LAT option. Certainly 351W heads were not stock or an LAT option, although it would take a pre; /html/tigers/2001-10/msg00002.html (6,832 bytes)
3. Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:40:20 -0700; Got an itch to go hunting on Ebay. With a STOCK 289 (well, it is proported to have the HI-PO 289 cam), close ratio trans (yes, someday I will get the wide ratios - Steve) and 2:88 gears which manifol; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00387.html (7,527 bytes)
4. Re: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: Rob Guerra <tiger351w@home.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:22:46 -0700; You have two very different manifolds there. After just going through an engine build that included a dyno session and bench flowing the heads I can give you some input. First of all, I am running t; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00392.html (8,574 bytes)
5. Re: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Jordan" <tjordan@wagnerprocess.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:29:08 -0700; my 66 Sunbeam Tiger (351 W) 64 Sunbeam Tiger (HiPo 289 Rob, Last I checked the 351W and HiPo 289 were never stock on a Sunbeam Tiger or correct for your class. Moot point with the current concours r; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00393.html (7,912 bytes)
6. RE: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Robert L." <RPalmer@brobeck.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:32:30 -0700; If you are referring to Tom's motor, he says he may have a HiPo cam, which I believe was available as a LAT option. Certainly 351W heads were not stock or an LAT option, although it would take a pre; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00394.html (7,949 bytes)
7. Re: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:02:32 -0700; Tim and Bob, (and Rob) I believe you will note that Rob is fortunate enough to have TWO Tigers (plus an odd assortment of other rolling units), as noted in his signature, I don't believe he was rever; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00395.html (8,663 bytes)
8. Re: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: RSpontelli@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 01:05:46 EDT; Unless you're talking 'bout a LeftCoast Tigers United-type event. In that case, full-on HiPo 289s, quick-steer racks, and suspensions mods up the ying-yang are all fine and dandy in the "stock" class; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00396.html (7,629 bytes)
9. Re: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: Norman Miller <rootes1@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:22:10 -0700; Flynn for PRESIDENT! ncm; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00397.html (7,190 bytes)
10. RE: Performer, F4B, Which Manifold? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:43:44 -0700; IN LIKE FLYNN Reference books almost universally assert that this set phrase, an American expression meaning to be successful emphatically or quickly, especially in regard to sexual seduction, refer; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00398.html (9,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]