Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Pertronix\s+coil\s+current\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Pertronix\s+coil\s+current\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Pertronix coil current. (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 23:46:12 -0600; Hi all, I took my Pertronix Ignitor II and the Flame Thrower II to the test dungeon and connected up the coil through a 0.05 ohm resistor, so that I could measure the current (as well as the dwell ti; /html/tigers/2003-07/msg00081.html (9,503 bytes)
2. RE: Pertronix coil current. (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:51:27 -0700; I think at 3,000 rpm you hit the limit of a purely resistive source like the Ignitor. Beyond that you need a capacitive discharge circuit (e.g., an MSD) to overcome the inductive impedance of the co; /html/tigers/2003-07/msg00083.html (6,833 bytes)
3. RE: Pertronix coil current. (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <theo.smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:19:06 -0600; That might be the case, but if it were true with the supposedly superior (to conventional ignitions) Ignitor II and FlameThrower II combination, I'd be disappointed. The distributorless crank trigge; /html/tigers/2003-07/msg00085.html (8,502 bytes)
4. RE: Pertronix coil current. (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:43:41 -0700; Perhaps I was being a little too cynical. I look forward to your next installment and hope for the best. But while we are waiting for your results, anyone interested can bone up on how capacitive di; /html/tigers/2003-07/msg00091.html (7,034 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]