- 1. Peru N/T maps (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Gossett <PeteGossett@netscape.net>
- Date: 29 Jun 00 12:07:21 CDT
- It seems to me like the biggest problem in this debate is the fact that Denver had the maps removed AFTER they were published on-line. A decision should have been made and adhered to, right or wrong.
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg01949.html (6,713 bytes)
- 2. Re: Peru N/T maps (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:19:47 -0700
- Now to me, this makes no sense. Denver didn't put the maps up there, it was done without thier knowledge. They rectified a poor decision made with all good intentions. AB Pete Gossett <PeteGossett@ne
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg01979.html (7,158 bytes)
- 3. Re: Peru N/T maps (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:51:42 -0700
- was all good Except, if having the map is really some kind of advantage, then now a select few of us that got them before they were pulled have an unfair advantage over everybody else, including the
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg01984.html (7,243 bytes)
- 4. Re: Peru N/T maps (score: 1)
- Author: Gail/Sid deLeon <deleon@sstar.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:44:25 -0500
- In"delta "if you have a course map,you are at a disadvantage.
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg01990.html (7,596 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu