Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Petronix\s+Vs\.\s+MSD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Petronix\s+Vs\.\s+MSD\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: "Craig Smith" <csmith1@awcwire.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:47:53 -0400; Why all the fuss about the Petronix unit? I have installed many MSD units on everything from Chevy 350's to Spit four bangers, same unit each time. MSD 6AL, the unit has modules for RPM limitation an; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00306.html (8,124 bytes)
2. Re: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: PorscheRcr@aol.com; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:44:21 EDT; << I don't work for them but I just love the product, take a look at the link and you folks tell me why Petronix has a lock on Spits? >> In some cases people don't want the big red box hanging out th; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00307.html (7,627 bytes)
3. RE: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: "Craig Smith" <csmith1@awcwire.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:56:46 -0400; I always mount the units inside the car, I like not having the electronics under the hood with the heat. I have mounted them just about anywhere on the inside, under the dash, top of foot wells, and; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00308.html (8,414 bytes)
4. Re: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:03:17 -0700; "The hardest thing to installation is mounting the thing. " Well Craig, you may have answered your own question. To each his own, but I preferred the Pertronix for it's simple design and for the fact; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00309.html (9,136 bytes)
5. Re: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:07:25 -0700; Craig, The best thing for performance is to do the MSD thing BUT use the pertronix as the trigger. The MSD creates a very hot spark and does it multiple times for each cylinder as it gets to the firi; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00310.html (8,807 bytes)
6. Re: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:38:18 -0400; And my car is still running just fine with its $4 points... Doug Braun '72 Spit /// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.t; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00311.html (7,595 bytes)
7. RE: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: Richard Gosling <richard.gosling@exprogroup.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:51:45 +0100; Mine too! Well, maybe not, but none of her problems are caused by the And my car is still running just fine with its $4 points... Doug Braun '72 Spit -- Important Notice: The information in this emai; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00312.html (8,360 bytes)
8. Re: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:12:33 -0700; As with many things, for many it comes down to diminishing returns. Points are cheap, work well, but need occasional maintenance and tweaking. Pertronix setups provide smoother ignition and require n; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00314.html (8,981 bytes)
9. Re: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: Alan Lemen <ralemen@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:27:52 -0600; Plus there's the need to replace a non-functional system with a new one in a distributor that is not set up for points anyway. i.e. My '76 with(out) a Lucas system had an Allison (now Crane) replacem; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00316.html (9,920 bytes)
10. Re: Petronix Vs. MSD (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:17:44 -0400; I can run points because my distributor is in pretty good shape, and the timing is steady. If I had a worn distributor, I think the Pertronix would be the most cost-effective fix. As for the higher m; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00318.html (7,817 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]