Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Plymouth\s+Rock\-\s+ers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Plymouth\s+Rock\-\s+ers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Plymouth Rock- ers (score: 1): Author: Elon Ormsby <ormsby1@llnl.gov>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:33:56 -0800; Scott asked . . . the mechanical cam going into my 440 plymouth has an advertised lift of .557 inches with rockers that have a 1:5 ratio. How much would 1:6 ratio rockers affect this. . . Scottt, you; /html/land-speed/2002-12/msg00464.html (7,142 bytes)
2. RE: Plymouth Rock- ers (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:15:16 -0600; I think Elon is right that you are talking about 1.5 and 1.6 to 1 rocker arms; sounds more typical, anyway. However, Elon's math seems off, to me: .1 is not 10% of 1.5; it is 6.67%. Here is the way; /html/land-speed/2002-12/msg00466.html (7,905 bytes)
3. RE: Plymouth Rock- ers (score: 1): Author: Twin Jugs Cycle <twinjugsharley@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:44:33 -0800 (PST); Elon... maybe I'm off here but IME you get final lift by multiplying the true cam lift(differencee between base circle and full lobe measurement) by the rocker arm ratio. If Scott's got an advertised; /html/land-speed/2002-12/msg00469.html (8,743 bytes)
4. Re: Plymouth Rock- ers (score: 1): Author: Twin Jugs Cycle <twinjugsharley@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:39:39 -0800 (PST); Good point JD and that most defintely bypasses the fear of knowing exactly what ratio rockers one has, but not sure I agree that's the best place to check(that is if the top of the valve is the stem); /html/land-speed/2002-12/msg00493.html (9,504 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]