Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Positive\s+Earth\s+vs\s+Negative\s+Earth\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Positive\s+Earth\s+vs\s+Negative\s+Earth\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Positive Earth vs Negative Earth?? (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT); A lister recently posted on switching his car from positive to negative earth... Can someone give me an explanation of the differences between the two, and what this means? Not real good on electrics; /html/mgs/2000-06/msg01260.html (6,898 bytes)
2. Re: Positive Earth vs Negative Earth?? (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 12:41:13 -0700; It's really an arbitrary convention. Works equally well either way. Basically, the difference is just which battery post is connected to the frame, and which to the starter. It's just that American c; /html/mgs/2000-06/msg01297.html (8,088 bytes)
3. Re: Positive Earth vs Negative Earth?? (score: 1): Author: paul.hunt1@virgin.net; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 20:17:31 +0100; I think the main reason is to be able to connect modern audio kit without having to insulate the chassis from the car body, also to convert from dynamo to alternator, and possibly reduce body corrosi; /html/mgs/2000-06/msg01335.html (7,635 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]