Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Possible\s+Fuel\s+injection\s+for\s+the\s+MGB\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Possible\s+Fuel\s+injection\s+for\s+the\s+MGB\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: Aeseeyou@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:54:32 EST; While discussing new things that have been taking place lately, one of our members brought up the possibility that Moss Motors has been working on a throttle body fuel injection system to replace ex; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00237.html (8,394 bytes)
2. Fw: Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: "ptegler@cablespeed" <ptegler@cablespeed.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 07:34:40 -0500; Take a look at TWM's catalog....they have a model/series 2700? throttle body that looks like a ZS carb someone stuck an injector in. The pdf file catalog shows a complete dual body kit already in exi; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00240.html (9,483 bytes)
3. Re: Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:11:42 EST; Only one problem - the execrable head design on the MGB. When you go from carbs to injection on many cars, the largest advantage is better fuel distribution, simply because the new injectors are poin; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00249.html (9,664 bytes)
4. Re: Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: Aeseeyou@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:19:00 EST; First let me thank you for all of the incredible information that I've been able to gain access to simply by visiting your fantastic goldmine of a website! I've turned all my friends on to it and th; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00255.html (8,483 bytes)
5. RE: Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:52:37 -0800; Hey Albert: So much for keeping stuff under wraps till it's ready to market. Geesh. This is the unofficial poop. There will not be an official release until the system is up, running and sorted with; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00257.html (10,924 bytes)
6. Re: Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: Jethogger@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:01:10 EST; Hello Bill. Well, put. I don't see why someone just doesn't design a new multi port injection head. The money they put in that alumummm B head. Was wrong direction. My two cents. John, Flintstone, GA; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00269.html (7,902 bytes)
7. Re: Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:13:52 EST; Yup - the non-crossflow head is a dead end no matter what material it is made from. The crossflow head could easily be modified for port injection, but there is no market out there to fund that sort; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00271.html (8,960 bytes)
8. Re: Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: kmr@pil.net; Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 21:34:38 GMT; The R&D work done by Pierce Manifolds for the "new" aluminum heads was quite large, Mike Pierce told me in the region of $40,000 before they had a production ready head. It wasn't the wrong directio; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00272.html (8,498 bytes)
9. Re: Possible Fuel injection for the MGB? (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:09:47 +1030; Well Kelvin, it is even less under wraps now - I just spread your info around a few people here in Australia and this is one of the responses I got from a fellow 'B racer here in Australia: ** "If yo; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00353.html (9,878 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]