Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Possible\s+Helicoil\s+use\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Possible\s+Helicoil\s+use\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Possible Helicoil use (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:19:02 -0800; To all, I have often wondered if it would make any sense to routinely helicoil (during a rebuild) all the head bolt holes, intake manifold bolt holes, and spark plug holes in a Rover/BOP engine in o; /html/mgb-v8/2003-02/msg00071.html (7,578 bytes)
2. RE: Possible Helicoil use (score: 1): Author: "Larry Embrey" <larry@embreyfamily.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:28:51 -0800; The only potential issue would be if the head bolts enter the water jacket. the BEST solution to keep from damaging the block would be to use studs tfor everything into the block? Other than the wate; /html/mgb-v8/2003-02/msg00072.html (8,838 bytes)
3. Re: Possible Helicoil use (score: 1): Author: "Michael Hartwig" <mhartwig@midsouth.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:14:09 -0600; If I were to use inserts, I wouldn't use helicoils. I'd use one of the solid inserts like timecerts or these that I found the other day http://www.muller.net/mullermachine/howto/insert/ /// /// mgb-v; /html/mgb-v8/2003-02/msg00074.html (8,416 bytes)
4. Re: Possible Helicoil use (score: 1): Author: "bown" <bown@concentric.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 08:27:12 -0700; Why not stick with a proven winner? I have used hundreds of Helicoils over the past 30 years. Never a single problem! Regards, Jim B. bolt future who /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list /// Se; /html/mgb-v8/2003-02/msg00075.html (9,155 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]