- 1. Potporri (score: 1)
- Author: FrizBMG@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 12:24:21 EDT
- Hi Tigers I am glad to see that no one took the suggestion to heart thatthe non-regular posters need to be taken off of this mailing list.I am a "lurker" mostly because I am trying to get my car toge
- /html/tigers/1998-06/msg00108.html (8,363 bytes)
- 2. Re: Potporri (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 13:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
- Pay attention if you use "early 302 heads" some have chamber volumes of 63 (nominal) cc's and some are of the 58cc size, and some are of the 52cc size. 260's had 52 cc chamber volumes and selecting
- /html/tigers/1998-06/msg00115.html (9,369 bytes)
- 3. Re: Potporri (score: 1)
- Author: jay peterson <japeterson@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 19:04:08 +0000
- Tony, One thing to watch if you use later model heads is the water jacket holes between the heads and the block as they can vary, specifically the middle upper ones closest to the carb. If you put t
- /html/tigers/1998-06/msg00153.html (8,068 bytes)
- 4. Re: Potporri (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 08:07:55 +0100
- The fine art of balancing. If you are re-assembling the exact engine that came from the factory, with no changes to the location of each piston, connecting rod, re-work of crank, flywheel, etc., the
- /html/tigers/1998-06/msg00162.html (8,504 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu