Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Power\s+to\s+weight\s+ratio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Power\s+to\s+weight\s+ratio\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:27:21 -0500; I think you're confused. Power to weight ratio can and will be anything, as you showed in your example. What was being asked/suggested is a formula or statement that says "for every ____ pounds remov; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00133.html (9,177 bytes)
2. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 13:58:42 -0600; Got it. Isn't reasonable, then, to suspect that dollars spent per horsepower gain might be better allocated to a health club? Food for thought, and probably fodder for an argument;-) /// unsubscribe/; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00137.html (9,003 bytes)
3. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:17:34 -0600; Nope, sorry. :) Right, I wasn't referring to the validity of the thought that power = acceleration (torque makes the world go 'round, y'know :). But saying X lb. = Y bhp is *exactly* the power to wei; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00141.html (9,828 bytes)
4. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:25:57 EST; Agreed Peter, and not argument, but heck, if it can't haul my fat butt around, what good is it. Robert B. Houston "Deck the halls with Boston Charley, Walla walla wash, and kalamazoo, Nora's freezin'; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00145.html (8,212 bytes)
5. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:44:14 -0600; == Sorry... lost the antecedent there...... what good is what? Your butt? ;-) Peter C "Wreck the malls with cows on Harleys" /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00153.html (8,315 bytes)
6. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 16:58:50 EST; The power to weight ratio is expressed as the engine torque to vehicle weight as a base line figure. Yes, the gearbox as a torque multiplier will increase the torque but the ratio is valid per gear a; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00172.html (9,260 bytes)
7. Fw: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:30:22 -0000; Yes, but there are exceptions... If, just for sake of argument, you were wanting to race a 2 stroke SAAB with one of those freewheel hub things, then momentum could take you a long, long way! Guy gai; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00178.html (7,994 bytes)
8. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:40:17 -0500; hey! i resemble that remark......i think! chuck. ? -- Original Message -- From "Guy Weller" <guy at weller-lakes.freeserve.co.uk> To: <spridgets@autox.team.net> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 5:30; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00184.html (8,754 bytes)
9. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 07:42:25 -0000; Oh Chuck, I didn't realise that my randomly chosen example would fit any real life circumstance! So - just remember not to touch those brakes! Good luck! Guy take /// unsubscribe/change address reque; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00238.html (8,783 bytes)
10. RE: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 23:07:14 +1100; LOL! That is my wife's line whenever I complain about needing more horsepower in either of my race/rally cars! Geez, it is bad enough to hear it at home, now I have to hear it here on the list! :-); /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00243.html (8,003 bytes)
11. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 08:31:58 -0500; And to think that all this time I thought Gigante was your REAL name, not a <dnw> 1972 Midget 1998 Safari 1999 9-3 1964 (Me) -- Original Message -- From "Mike Gigante" <mikeg at vicnet.net.au> /// un; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00250.html (8,518 bytes)
12. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 16:17:37 -0500; Well the point of the original suggestion was to increase acceleration by reducing weight, and the equivalent increase of total engine power. What I was saying is that HP/weight ratio is rather super; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00256.html (12,218 bytes)
13. Re: Power to weight ratio (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 14:53:10 +1100; It *is* my real name - fate can be so cruel! :-) Mike "also known as Gigantor as a kid" G. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/l; /html/spridgets/2001-12/msg00310.html (9,237 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]