Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Power\s+to\s+weight\s+ratio\s+$non\s+tiger$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Power\s+to\s+weight\s+ratio\s+$non\s+tiger$\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Power to weight ratio (non tiger) (score: 1): Author: "G Shaw" <emmakita@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:40:12 -0400; I know that the engineers on this list will have an answer for this. Last night on a repeat of "Junk Yard Wars" an expert said that the power to weight ratio that we all know is so important in maki; /html/tigers/2001-08/msg00266.html (7,321 bytes)
2. Re: Power to weight ratio (non tiger) (score: 1): Author: SFordRB@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:57:14 EDT; It's simple. You cannot exceed the speed of light (E=MC 2 sorry, no super script). Now if I could only build that warp motor. Dr. Moonstone; /html/tigers/2001-08/msg00269.html (6,974 bytes)
3. Re: Power to weight ratio (non tiger) (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:05:26 -0700; Greg, The statement is correct, in a limited range of comparisons. It really describes the acceleration "potential" of two different vehicles. "Goes faster" has a limited meaning. For two cars that a; /html/tigers/2001-08/msg00272.html (9,675 bytes)
4. Re: Power to weight ratio (non tiger) (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:19:09 -0700; Well, I don't know the context of the original statement. But there are two simple things to consider. One is that the car can be quick, the other fast. Quick has to do with the old F=m*a equation we; /html/tigers/2001-08/msg00273.html (8,635 bytes)
5. Re: Power to weight ratio (non tiger) (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:19:02 -0700; Sean, You want Warp Motor? Why didn't you ask, I have the instructions. 1) Start car and idle in driveway until operating temperature reached. 2) Drain radiator fluid into suitable environmentally sa; /html/tigers/2001-08/msg00274.html (8,221 bytes)
6. Re: Power to weight ratio (non tiger) (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:31:06 -0700; I must admit that Mayf has the acceleration formula correct, and that original statement (wrong on the face of it), does not alter the relationships I did provide about assumptions. Just listen to ol; /html/tigers/2001-08/msg00275.html (7,687 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]