Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Prather\s+retraction\s+2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Prather\s+retraction\s+2\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Prather retraction 2 (score: 1): Author: "andrew stark" <whitedog72@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:03:04 +0000; For some reason my home PC fails to send text in hotmail. ;o( I wanted to say I have no issue with Prather himself. He is a talented mechanic and driver. I don't like the rules of the limited prep bi; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00254.html (7,372 bytes)
2. Re: Prather retraction 2 (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:32:45 EDT; Yeah. Much to be said for that. Such rules are TERRIBLE...unless of course you're in on it. Bill; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00255.html (7,434 bytes)
3. Re: Prather retraction 2 (score: 1): Author: "Glen" <fubog@beon.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 11:53:50 -0400; Personally I see it not as an issue with any driver/team but more as an SCCA issue. You guys that have been around the club for awhile will remember back in late 70s & into the 80s when they were doi; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00256.html (8,573 bytes)
4. Re: Prather retraction 2 (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@att.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 11:37:54 -0500; The thread on Prather and the inclusion of big bore limited prep cars with fully prepared cars is interesting. I began racing in the northeast before Cal Club "limited prep' rules came into SCCA, and; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00257.html (8,314 bytes)
5. Re: Prather retraction 2 (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@q1.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:40:05 -0400; glen is correct. the same thing is seen in vintage. the large sanctioning bodies are "for profit" companies. this is not necesarily true of teh the smaller groups but certainly hsr/svra on the east c; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00262.html (9,536 bytes)
6. Re: Prather retraction 2 (score: 1): Author: EPRacer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:00:15 EDT; I feel the need to interject my couple of cents........ SCCA, Inc. is still a club, very much so, but the current leaders want to play with the big boys and SCCA Pro Racing, which is a separate grou; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00277.html (9,138 bytes)
7. Re: Prather retraction 2 (score: 1): Author: Bob Bownes <bownes@seiri.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:06:08 -0400; One of the reasons I don't read the wheel2wheel email list, is the constant banging of the 'SCCA Inc.' drum. If the members don't like the way the club is going, it is up to them to change it. It's h; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00281.html (9,853 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]