Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Primary\s+coil\s+resistance\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Primary\s+coil\s+resistance\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:59:18 -0700 (PDT); Last week I wrote that my 1974 TR6 was missing and stumbling under load - just two days after I had adjusted the valves and actually thought that it was running good. Well it turns out that I misread; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00119.html (8,269 bytes)
2. Re: Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:08:33 -0700; Not necessarily so! If the magnets in the collar come unglued, they can move around, fall over, and otherwise become disoriented. The car may still start, but it won't run very well. Put a set of poi; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00122.html (7,478 bytes)
3. Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:16:59 -0400; Message text written by Joe Merone terminal to engine ground, voltage read from positive coil terminal to different engine ground - 8.05 volts. Resistance across coil terminals with all wires off - 3; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00124.html (7,506 bytes)
4. Re: Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:51:39 EDT; << Well it turns out that I misread the manual and had the valves opened WAY TOO MUCH. It's a wonder it ran smoothly at all. >> If by opened up too much mean, too large of a lash, the engine will run; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00132.html (7,206 bytes)
5. RE: Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:43:24 -0700; That indicates your TR6 has the ballast resistor incorporated in the wiring harness. Is this where you're getting power for the Pertronix from ? If memory serves, it has to have a source of +12v fro; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00143.html (7,616 bytes)
6. Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: Joe Merone <jmerone@rocketmail.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:59:18 -0700 (PDT); Last week I wrote that my 1974 TR6 was missing and stumbling under load - just two days after I had adjusted the valves and actually thought that it was running good. Well it turns out that I misread; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00905.html (9,063 bytes)
7. Re: Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: "Kinderlehrer" <kinderlehrer@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:08:33 -0700; Not necessarily so! If the magnets in the collar come unglued, they can move around, fall over, and otherwise become disoriented. The car may still start, but it won't run very well. Put a set of poi; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00908.html (8,279 bytes)
8. Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: Dave Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:16:59 -0400; Message text written by Joe Merone terminal to engine ground, voltage read from positive coil terminal to different engine ground - 8.05 volts. Resistance across coil terminals with all wires off - 3; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00910.html (8,279 bytes)
9. Re: Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: ZinkZ10C@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:51:39 EDT; << Well it turns out that I misread the manual and had the valves opened WAY TOO MUCH. It's a wonder it ran smoothly at all. >> If by opened up too much mean, too large of a lash, the engine will run; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00918.html (7,909 bytes)
10. RE: Primary coil resistance? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:43:24 -0700; That indicates your TR6 has the ballast resistor incorporated in the wiring harness. Is this where you're getting power for the Pertronix from ? If memory serves, it has to have a source of +12v fro; /html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00929.html (8,380 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]