Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proof\s+that\s+Kansas\s+is\s+flatter\s+than\s+a\s+pancake\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proof\s+that\s+Kansas\s+is\s+flatter\s+than\s+a\s+pancake\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: Mike Shields <mshields@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:59:23 -0600; Yes folks, it's true, Kansas is flat. I mean really flat. We all know it from driving through it on 70 (at least those of us from the west coast), but here is scientific proof that Kansas is flatter; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00293.html (7,977 bytes)
2. Re: Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: Scott Troyer - TestEng DDR TMR <stroyer@micron.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:55:57 -0600; While Kansas may appear to be flat, last year while driving/riding to Nationals I noticed that upon entering Kansas from the west side from Colorado the elvation was actually at 5000 feet. Even thoug; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00295.html (8,606 bytes)
3. RE: Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:50:17 -0500; So while Kansas may be flat, it is also a little lopsided. I had a girlfriend in college that was like that too. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http:/; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00304.html (7,892 bytes)
4. Re: Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: "P.Herder" <p.herder@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:00:26 -0500; Well you may think it was 5000 feet but the highest point in Kansas is only 4039 feet. http://www.dimensional.com/~jbettin/air/ks000.htm I do agree that the state is lopsided, tho'. ;^) Paul Herder (; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00305.html (9,173 bytes)
5. Re: Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:17:07 -0500; As a Kansas resident I can only respond -- "We resemble that remark." When the Solo Nationals were held in Salina, I always got a kick out of the difference in perception between drivers coming from; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00306.html (9,008 bytes)
6. Re: Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: "Mike Lowe" <mikelowe93@Houston.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:28:42 -0500; I usually drive to Totoland from the South via I35. The hills are somewhat interesting and IIRC, you get to 1200 feet altitude before falling down to Topeka at ~700 feet. In 2001, I co-drove another; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00307.html (8,641 bytes)
7. Re: Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:00:46 -0500; Anyone who thinks Kansas is inordinately flat has never been to North Devil's Lake is threatening to devour a huge chunk of it. They want to drain it to the Red River, but so far Minnesota and Manito; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00310.html (8,293 bytes)
8. Re: Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: Scott Troyer - TestEng DDR TMR <stroyer@micron.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:02:32 -0600; Perhaps the altimiter used was a little suspect, as another reply also states that Topeka is at ~700 feet, but in general, Kansas is 3 to 4 thousand feet higher on the west end than the east. Okay, I; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00318.html (10,294 bytes)
9. Re: Proof that Kansas is flatter than a pancake (score: 1): Author: "Mike Lowe" <mikelowe93@Houston.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:45:20 -0500; Heck, my cool DeLorme 3D topography program can chart all kinds of altitude stuff like that and show you the altitude anywhere. I'd tinker with it tonight but I'm a bit busy. :-( Best $100 I've ever; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00328.html (8,674 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]